2011
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201000122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIBuilder: Exhaustive Searching for De Novo Ligands

Abstract: The de novo design program BIBuilder has been developed for structure-based as well as ligand-based design. Incremental growth allows for the de novo design of novel molecules with putative bioactivity. In addition, linking between existing fragments enables scaffold hopping tasks. A RECAP-based retrosynthetic fragment connection protocol yields ligands that are synthesizable. An exhaustive fragment search protocol assures that known ligands are always found if all necessary fragments exist in the database of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scaffold-hopping method has led to the discovery of NCEs with the desired biochemical and pharmacological effects . Moreover, the design concept is implemented in several related programs (e.g., TOPAS, BI Builder) and together with other receptor- and ligand-based tools provides a broad choice of working methods for idea generation in drug discovery. Figure shows selected examples of de novo designed compounds from recent publications ( 5 ; 6 , 10 ; 7 ; 8 ; 9 ; 11 ; 12 ; , 13 ; 14 ; 15 ; 16 ; 17 ).…”
Section: Drug Design Is a Complex Adaptive Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaffold-hopping method has led to the discovery of NCEs with the desired biochemical and pharmacological effects . Moreover, the design concept is implemented in several related programs (e.g., TOPAS, BI Builder) and together with other receptor- and ligand-based tools provides a broad choice of working methods for idea generation in drug discovery. Figure shows selected examples of de novo designed compounds from recent publications ( 5 ; 6 , 10 ; 7 ; 8 ; 9 ; 11 ; 12 ; , 13 ; 14 ; 15 ; 16 ; 17 ).…”
Section: Drug Design Is a Complex Adaptive Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61,63,75,76,92 Alternatively, SMILES and 2D graphs have been used to represent only the molecular structure of the building blocks, i.e., the content of the vertices, while a dedicated data structure defined the surrounding graph-like chromosome. 30,73,91,118,119 The analogous strategy with 3D representation has been used, 58,66,74,88,[120][121][122] but mostly in connection to fragment-based drug discovery, 123 which should not be confused with the fragment-based building strategy introduced above, although the latter is usually implemented as part of the former. 78 With an alternative use of graphs, the construction and modification of molecules can be seen as a short walk on a graph that spans all possible fragments and connections.…”
Section: Chemical Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of an ensemble of 3D stereoelectronic features shared by well-known active compounds and, hence, necessary to ensure a favorable interaction with a particular biological target of interest (Wallach, 2011;Sanders et al, 2012). Intriguingly, despite the increasing number of examples for pharmacophore modeling or FBDD reported in the last two decades, the implications of a combined implementation of these approaches have been poorly discussed and analyzed, except for a couple of research works published by (Teodoro and Muegge, 2011;Fechner and Schneider, 2007), respectively. However, we believe that several key aspects still remain unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%