Handbuch Netzwerkforschung 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92575-2_70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometrische Netzwerke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second method uses citation analysis to establish (e.g., co-citation) relationships among publications, authors, journals, etc. The relationships are represented on two-dimensional maps (networks), which are then studied by using network analysis (Havemann and Scharnhorst, 2012). In these bibliographic networks, node-related differences (e.g., differing node sizes) offer insight into a scientific field's composition (Van Eck and Waltman, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second method uses citation analysis to establish (e.g., co-citation) relationships among publications, authors, journals, etc. The relationships are represented on two-dimensional maps (networks), which are then studied by using network analysis (Havemann and Scharnhorst, 2012). In these bibliographic networks, node-related differences (e.g., differing node sizes) offer insight into a scientific field's composition (Van Eck and Waltman, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite their benefits, co-citation networks also have limitations. For example, the articles in a cluster may extend beyond a single theme (e.g., as papers address multiple questions simultaneously; Havemann and Scharnhorst, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bibliometric network analysis refers to a computer-assisted scientific review methodology that provides quantitative and statistical analysis by summarizing a large number of research publications through various descriptors and indicators [ 17 ]. Havemann and Scharnhorst [ 18 ] organized the approaches of bibliometric networks into the following categories: (1) citation networks of articles and journals; (2) bibliographic coupling networks; (3) cocitation networks of articles, authors, and journals; (4) co-authorship networks; and (5) word co-occurrence networks (ie, coword analysis). Among them, coword analysis has been considered an effective approach for understanding key topics in a certain research area, calculating the association strength of representative terms, and illustrating the field's knowledge structure by revealing patterns and trends among those topics [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how often term j appears in document i (e.g. Coulter et al 1998;Havemann and Scharnhorst 2010). For network visualization, clusters are created in five steps: 1) Calculation of the Equivalence Index: For every pair of terms i and j, a value e ij describing the intensity of their connection is determined, which indicates the frequency of co-occurrence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%