Bibliometric analysis of sustainable business performance: where are we going? A science map of the field

Boţa-Avram, Cristina

doi:10.1080/1331677x.2022.2096094

Cited by 21 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2021, 2022; Anuar et al. , 2022; Boța-Avram, 2023b, c). In terms of content analysis and systematic literature review, we followed the approach of recent studies in systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (Zabavnik and Verbič, 2021; Hazaea et al.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This recent version introduced by Page et al. (2021) encompasses new reporting guiding principles that reflect advances in identifying, selecting, evaluating and summarising studies (Boța-Avram, 2023c). The PRISMA flowchart employed in this study is disclosed in Figure 1.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2020; Zhang and Liang, 2020; Caputo et al. , 2021; Ahmed and Hussainey, 2023; Boța-Avram, 2023 b, c). The database search was realised at the beginning of September 2023, covering the period from 2000 to 2023.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Examining the white and dark sides of digitalisation effects on corruption: unveiling research patterns and insights for future research

Boța-Avram

2024

JRF

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to review the current literature on the positive and negative effects of digitalisation in preventing corruption. It analyses existing research patterns and provides recommendations for future studies.Design/methodology/approachThis paper employed bibliometric analysis and systematic review to scrutinise 190 papers from the Web of Science database from 2000 to 2023. Biblioshiny on R Studio was used for advanced bibliometric analysis to determine publication dynamics, influential journals, publications and impactful authors and a three-field plot to analyse relationships among countries, keywords and journals.FindingsThis study provides a bibliometric analysis of the past and actual developments in the field related to the effects of digitalisation on corruption. Based on the systematic literature review on a sample of the 50 most influential articles, this study identified background theories employed, the primary research methodologies adopted and valuable insights into both the positive and negative aspects of the impact of digitalisation on corruption.Originality/valueThis study provides an extended overview of the effects of digitalisation on corruption and advances new avenues for further research related to this field. The white and dark sides of the effects of digitalisation on corruption are highlighted. Furthermore, the study identifies the need for further research in this field to gain a more in-depth understanding of the nexus between digitalisation and corruption.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Examining the white and dark sides of digitalisation effects on corruption: unveiling research patterns and insights for future research

Boța-Avram

2024

JRF

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Combining all the method, including network metrics, with the aforementioned techniques is essential for accurately the conceptual framework of the research subject under consideration [ 8 , 27 , [29] , [30] , [31] ]. In particular, network analysis significantly improves the conversation about research trends within particular study disciplines or topics.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the influence of financial inclusion on investment decision: A bibliometric review

Pranajaya,

Alexandri,

Chan

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Scientific mapping describes the relationships, connections, and interactions in research. The frequently used scientific mappings are country co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence maps [ 98 ]. A co-authorship map studies the scientific interaction among researchers in a topic.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Analysis of Granger Causality Studies

Siew

Lam

Jaaman

et al. 2023

Entropy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Granger causality provides a framework that uses predictability to identify causation between time series variables. This is important to policymakers for effective policy management and recommendations. Granger causality is recognized as the primary advance on the causation problem. The objective of this paper is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of Granger causality publications indexed in the Web of Science database. Harzing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer were used for performance analysis and science mapping. The first paper indexed was published in 1981 and there has been an upward trend in the annual publication of Granger causality studies which are shifting towards the areas of environmental science, energy, and economics. Most of the publications are articles and proceeding papers under the areas of business economics, environmental science ecology, and neurosciences/neurology. China has the highest number of publications while the United States has the highest number of citations. England has the highest citation impact. This paper also constructed country co-authorship, co-analysis of cited references, cited sources, and cited authors, keyword co-occurrence, and keyword overlay visualization maps.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of sustainable business performance: where are we going? A science map of the field

Cited by 21 publications

References 91 publications

Examining the white and dark sides of digitalisation effects on corruption: unveiling research patterns and insights for future research

Examining the white and dark sides of digitalisation effects on corruption: unveiling research patterns and insights for future research

Examining the influence of financial inclusion on investment decision: A bibliometric review

Bibliometric Analysis of Granger Causality Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About