2017
DOI: 10.3390/app7121316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometric Analysis of Social Robotics Research: Identifying Research Trends and Knowledgebase

Abstract: Abstract:As robotics becomes ubiquitous, there is increasing interest in understanding how to develop robots that better respond to social needs, as well as how robotics impacts society. This is evidenced by the growing rate of publications on social robotics. In this article, we analyze the citation network of academic articles on social robotics to understand its structure, reveal research trends and expose its knowledgebase. We found eight major clusters, namely robots as social partners, human factors and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bibliometric analysis by Mejia and Kajikawa [19] referenced above also highlights that the social robotics literature comprises only a small portion (2.3%) of the larger robotics knowledgebase. When further investigating the extant social robotics literature, Mejia and Kajikawa [19] find that even though concepts of socialness play a central role, the social sciences are hardly represented. The authors write aptly: "Social robotics is social in its intention, but its knowledgebase is concentrated in the engineering and technology domains" (p.11).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bibliometric analysis by Mejia and Kajikawa [19] referenced above also highlights that the social robotics literature comprises only a small portion (2.3%) of the larger robotics knowledgebase. When further investigating the extant social robotics literature, Mejia and Kajikawa [19] find that even though concepts of socialness play a central role, the social sciences are hardly represented. The authors write aptly: "Social robotics is social in its intention, but its knowledgebase is concentrated in the engineering and technology domains" (p.11).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of HRI, social robots take on a special role, and fall under the category of 'proximate interaction', in which 'humans and robots interact as peers or companions' [18]. Based on reference information of articles they extracted, Mejia and Kajikawa [19] identified relevant clusters that represent the social robotics knowledgebase. The largest clusters in social robotics research can be summarized as 'robots as social partners' and 'human factors and ergonomics in human-robot interaction'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the last decade, the developmental trends in robotics have included humanoid robots, natural interaction, therapy robots, and social robots (Goeldner, Herstatt, and Tietze 2015). In social robotics, the main publication trends have concerned robots as social partners as well as robots supporting children's development and assisting elderly people (Mejia and Kajikawa 2017). Maybe reflecting the trendy emphasis on social interaction, the image that tends to dominate public discussions of robotic care is that of naturally interacting humanoids.…”
Section: Demands Of Dignity In Robotic Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These robots are expected to be employed as companions to seniors and children, housekeeping, surveillance, etc. [1,2]. In order to accomplish such tasks, it is essential that the robot seamlessly recognizes its own location inside the home-similar to humans who are effortlessly aware of their whereabouts at any instant, e.g., kitchen or living room.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%