Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and development trends in selective fetal reduction

Meng, Yi L.; Ren, Li; Yin, Shao

doi:10.1111/jog.14721

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Keyword analysis can represent one of the most effective ways to understand the development of the literature over time. [40] Based on VOSviewer software author keywords that appeared at least 20 times in the paper were included in the analysis and divided into 4 groups, as shown in Figure 4. Out of 4445 keywords, a total of 124 met the threshold value.…”

Section: Analysis Of Research Hotspotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of risk management in the doctor–patient relationship: A systematic quantitative literature review

Li,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This paper analyzed the research on risk management in the doctor–patient relationship (DPR) based on a systematic quantitative literature review approach using bibliometric software. It aims to uncover potential information about current research and predict future research hotspots and trends. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant publications in the Scopus database and the Web of Science Core Collection database from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2023. We analyzed the data using CiteSpace 6.2.R2 and VOSviewer 1.6.19 software to examine the annual number of publications, countries/regions, journals, citations, authors, and keywords in the field. Results: A total of 553 articles and reviews that met the criteria were included in this study. There is an overall upward trend in the number of publications issued; in terms of countries/regions, the United States and the United Kingdom are the largest contributors; Patient Education and Counseling is the most productive journal (17); Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis is the most cited article (1637); the field has not yet to form a stable and obvious core team; the analysis of high-frequency keywords revealed four main research directions: the causes of DPR risks, coping strategies, measurement tools, and research related to people prone to doctor–patient risk characteristics; the causes of DPR risks, coping strategies, measurement tools, and research related to people prone to doctor–patient risk characteristics; the keyword burst analysis revealed several shifts in the research hotspots for risk management in the DPR, suggesting that chronic disease management, is a future research direction for the continued development of risk management in the DPR. Conclusions: The visualization analysis of risk management literature in the DPR using CiteSpace and VOSviewer software provides insights into the current research status and highlights future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of Research Hotspotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of risk management in the doctor–patient relationship: A systematic quantitative literature review

Li,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Keywords analysis can represent one of the most effective ways of understanding the developments in literature over time (48). Every time two subject terms appear together in a publication's keywords they are linked together.…”

Section: Keyword Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavioral Theories That Have Influenced the Way Health State Preferences Are Elicited and Interpreted: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis of the Time Trade-Off Method With VOSviewer Visualization

Henstock

Wong²,

Tsuchiya³

et al. 2022

Front.Health Serv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimThe aim of this paper is to develop an understanding of how behavioral theories have influenced the way preferences for health-related quality of life are elicited and interpreted. We focus on the Time Trade-off (TTO) method given it represents the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) concept—that survival in less-than-full health can be deemed equivalent to a shorter survival in full health. To our knowledge this is the first review using a combination of systematic scoping review, bibliometrics and VOSviewer visualization to map the development of ideas in health economics.MethodsA priori, we selected three behavioral theories to explore within our review, referred to here as Expected Utility Theory, Non-Expected Utility Theory and Probabilistic Choice Theory. A fourth topic, Order Effects, is defined broadly to encompass behavioral theories around timing/sequence of events. For the main search, Scopus was used to identify literature that had (a) elicited TTO values and/or (b) contributed to the way TTO values were elicited and interpreted, from inception to July 2021. Papers that focused on the latter category were given the label “behavioral” and underwent additional analyses. A two stage-screening was applied to assess eligibility. Co-citation, co-authorship and co-occurrence of keywords was used to chart the development of TTO over time.ResultsA total of 1,727 records were retrieved from Scopus and were supplemented by an additional 188 papers. There were 856 applied and 280 behavioral papers included in the final corpus, with the behavioral set split equally into four sets of 70 papers to chart the development of keywords over time: (1) 1972–1999; (2) 2000–2010, (3) 2010–2015 and (4) 2015–2021.DiscussionThe keyword analysis suggested that whilst some ideas transition quickly from economic theory to the TTO literature, such as the impact of Order Effects, others take longer to be assimilated, for example Non-Expected Utility models or failure of constant discounting. It is therefore important that researchers within health economics work more closely with those in mainstream economics and keep abreast of the wider economics and behavioral sciences to expedite the uptake of new and relevant ideas.

show abstract

“…A bibliometric review is a research approach that analyses the frequencies, patterns and impacts of research contributions made by researchers, journals, organisations, countries and continents on a research topic [15][16][17]. This approach identifies the priorities on a research topic and provides researchers with crucial information on the research growth and future directions in an academic discipline [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study -a bibliometric review -seeks to identify the major contributors, themes and trends of poverty research using citation scooping and analysis and obtain information about scientific productivity and the geographical distribution of research and scholarly contributions to poverty [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. This bibliometric review will also visualise the growth of research productivity and progress concerning poverty from 2016 -the year after SDGs were instituted -to date and identify the research priorities according to the topic of poverty.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The state of global research on poverty after SDG declaration

Kanmodi

Amzat

Nnyanzi

2023

Public Health Challenges

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPoverty is a significant global problem which can hinder the attainment of the United Nations’ (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Poverty reduction or elimination requires adequate scientific or research contributions, creating socio‐scientific frames that could inform relevant stakeholders in policy planning, implementation and evaluation. This study aims to review the state of global research on poverty (2016 and upwards), since the UN's declaration of SDGs in 2015.MethodsThis study adopted a bibliometric review design. On 31 May 2022, a systematic SCOPUS‐based search was conducted to retrieve all journal papers published on poverty (2016 till 31 May 2022). The bibliometric data of the retrieved papers were analysed using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer software.ResultA total of 15,143 journal papers on poverty were retrieved, of which 91.2% were published in English, whereas slightly more than half (52.9%) were published in the social sciences. Although all regions of the world sourced journal papers on poverty, however, countries from the Global North, particularly the USA and the United Kingdom, dominated other countries in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. Among Global South countries, China leads in terms of authorship, funding and institutional affiliations. South America and Africa contributed the smallest volume of journal papers on poverty.ConclusionThere exist global inequalities in research productivity on poverty. The global poverty problem skews to the Global South, but the scientific contributions flow from the Global North. There is a need to narrow the existing inequality gaps in the research productivity on poverty through North–South synergetic research collaborations.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and development trends in selective fetal reduction

Cited by 6 publications

References 46 publications

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of risk management in the doctor–patient relationship: A systematic quantitative literature review

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of risk management in the doctor–patient relationship: A systematic quantitative literature review

Behavioral Theories That Have Influenced the Way Health State Preferences Are Elicited and Interpreted: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis of the Time Trade-Off Method With VOSviewer Visualization

The state of global research on poverty after SDG declaration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About