Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018

Adanır, Saliha Seda; Bahşi, İlhan; Kervancıoğlu, Piraye; Orhan, Mustafa; Cihan, Ömer Faruk

doi:10.2399/ana.20.019

Cited by 12 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many researchers need to collaborate in medical publications, unlike in other fields (10). This is because co-authorship is essential in the emergence of publications in the medical field (11). Bibliometric analysis is gaining in importance and evaluates existing research data accurately and efficiently on an evidence-based basis (12,13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bibliometric analysis is gaining in importance and evaluates existing research data accurately and efficiently on an evidence-based basis (12,13). Bibliometric analysis is a compelling method for predicting the change and evolution of a research field (11,13). It can also provide evidence for a better understanding of the developmental trend in a particular area (14,15).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result of the detailed literature review, it was seen that although there have been separate bibliometric studies conducted in the field of anatomy (5,11), and ORL (18), no bibliometric study evaluating the joint publications of both fields was found.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An Analysis of the Mutual Publications of Anatomists and Otorhinolaryngologists: A Bibliometric Study based on the Web of Science Database

Tekın¹,

Bahşi²

2022

tr-ent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:The aim of this study is to bibliometrically examine the mutual studies in the fields of anatomy and otorhinolaryngology (ORL) recorded in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 1980-2020. Material and Methods:The mutual publications of anatomists and otolaryngologists on 31.01.2021 are listed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded category of the Advanced Search section of the WoS database. Thus, in the search field tags, Department of Anatomy for anatomists and Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) or Department of Otorhinolaryngology or Clinic of ENT or Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology for otolaryngologists were used for the address section. Publications from 2021, meeting abstracts, proceedings papers, early accesses, and book chapters were excluded. After the exclusion criteria were applied, the bibliometric characteristics of the remaining publications were examined. Results: After the exclusion criteria were applied, 1395 articles were found. The total number of citations made to these articles was 42537, and at least one citation was made to 1279 of the 1395 articles (91.68%). The h-index of these articles was 82, and the average number of citations was 30.49. In these articles, the most frequently used first five keywords were immunohistochemistry (44 times), rat (39 times), cochlea (38 times), anatomy (36 times), and facial nerve (27 times). Conclusion:The results of our bibliometric study which evaluated the last 40 years of data in terms of networks, collaborations, and institutions could be an inspiration and source for future researchers. We may state that with the increasing technology, the applicability of interventional methods in the field of ORL might be increased by conducting more anatomical studies and yield safer results.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Analysis of the Mutual Publications of Anatomists and Otorhinolaryngologists: A Bibliometric Study based on the Web of Science Database

Tekın¹,

Bahşi²

2022

tr-ent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bibliometric analysis consists of the application of statistical methods to identify qualitative and quantitative changes related to a particular scientific research topic, to profile publications on related topics, and to reveal trends within a discipline (8). The development and efficiency of a scientific field or a journal in the literature can be evaluated by bibliometric studies (9). Researchers looking for information on a special topic can derive benefit from analyzes that measure scientific trends and the impact of the literature in their research area (10).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)

Kundakci

ÜNVER

2022

Genel Tıp Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to reveal descriptive data about postgraduate theses on anatomy and to determine their general trends. Material and Methods: The full text of 390 theses published in the Anatomy Department of Basic Medical Sciences in the archive of the National Thesis Center between 2016-2020 were included in the study. The theses were analysed recording their name, type, year of publication, systematic and topographic anatomy class, study design, keywords, receiving budget support, academic title of the advisor, gender of the author, undergraduate education, and universities where the theses were published. Frequency and percentage values were used for descriptive statistics and categorical variables. Results: Of the theses, 237 (60.8%) were written by women, 242 (62.1%) were master's theses, 254 (65.1%) thesis advisor was professor, 113 (29%) received budget support, and 169 (43.3%) used radiological methods. The undergraduate educations of the authors were ranked as physiotherapy and rehabilitation (n=167, 42.8%), biology (n=64, 16.4%), nursing (n=58, 14.9%) and medicine (n=57, 14.6%). Of the thesis, 126 (32.3%) were from the head region and 174 (44.9%) were from the movement system. The most used keywords were as follows: computed tomography (n=58), morphometry (n=41), anthropometry (n=30), anatomy (n=27) and magnetic resonance imaging (n=25). Conclusion: In this study, bibliometric data related to theses on anatomy were examined and a wide range of information was presented to researchers in the field of anatomy. In recent years, it has been seen that female researchers and physiotherapists have come to the fore in anatomy postgraduate education. It can be said that especially studies involving the movement and nervous system or the head, lower and upper extremities attract the attention of researchers. In addition, radiological, experimental animal and anthropometric methods are frequently used in study designs. It is expected that the result of the study will shed light on anatomy graduate students, clinicians and researchers who carry out or will carry out various academic studies.

show abstract

“…Besides objective and reliable analyses like the change in research subjects and most investigated topics, they also provide the most producible scientists and institutions. 10 - 12 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Research on Hereditary Hearing Impairment Over the Last 40 Years: A Bibliometric Study

Tekın¹,

Bahşi²,

Bayazıt³

et al. 2021

Int Adv Otol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018

Abstract: Objectives: Bibliometry is a research approach to measure and analyze the productivity of the literature in a specific area or journal. Therefore, bibliometric analysis is significant in the evaluation of the journals. In this study, we aimed to examine the articles published in Anatomy (

Cited by 12 publications

References 14 publications

An Analysis of the Mutual Publications of Anatomists and Otorhinolaryngologists: A Bibliometric Study based on the Web of Science Database

An Analysis of the Mutual Publications of Anatomists and Otorhinolaryngologists: A Bibliometric Study based on the Web of Science Database

Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)

Global Research on Hereditary Hearing Impairment Over the Last 40 Years: A Bibliometric Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About