1971
DOI: 10.1177/030631277100100107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliographical Statistics as a Guide To Growth Points in Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…He produced evidence to support Smith's observation that For decades the multiple-author publication, frequently referred to as a co-authored publication, has been used as a basic counting unit to measure collaborative activity. Smith was one of the first researchers to observe an increase in the incidence of multiple-authorship has been increasing [58], 4 a trend since confirmed by several other investigators [1][2][3][4]40,42] 5. However, such studies have also shown that the rate of increase in multiple-authorship has varied considerably with subject area [40,61], and in a few cases (e.g., biomedicine [7]) there seems to have been no significant growth.…”
Section: Multiple Authorship and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…He produced evidence to support Smith's observation that For decades the multiple-author publication, frequently referred to as a co-authored publication, has been used as a basic counting unit to measure collaborative activity. Smith was one of the first researchers to observe an increase in the incidence of multiple-authorship has been increasing [58], 4 a trend since confirmed by several other investigators [1][2][3][4]40,42] 5. However, such studies have also shown that the rate of increase in multiple-authorship has varied considerably with subject area [40,61], and in a few cases (e.g., biomedicine [7]) there seems to have been no significant growth.…”
Section: Multiple Authorship and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is general consensus that the observed growth in multiple-authorship is evidence of an increase in collaboration [2][3][4]7,16,40]. However, the assumption that multiple-authorship and collaboration are synonymous must be qualified with the recognition that in some instances not all those named on a paper are responsible for the work and should not share the credit accorded to it.…”
Section: Multiple Authorship and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The countries with highest publication counts in IEE T Educ include USA (54.58%), Spain (5.87%), UK (4.44%), Canada (4.27%) and Australia (2.18%). c) The institutes with most number of articles in this journal are: Georgia Institute of Technology (49), US Department of Defense (49), California State University System (45), University of California System (45) and Florida State University System (37). Since the IEEE T Educ dataset spans 49 years so it has been divided into decades; except for the last time span which is only 9 years, i.e.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers collaborate with each other for various reasons. This can be to improve their visibility and recognition (Narin et al 1991), to utilise expensive equipment that is not under their control (Meadows and O'Connor 1971;Schubert and Sooryamoorthy 2010), or to acquire expertise and new ideas (Beaver and Rosen 1978) needed for research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%