2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-002-0243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biaxial deformation of dough using the bubble inflation technique. II. Numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the foaming process upon baking is essentially a biaxial extensional deformation while during dough mixing uniaxial extension and/or compression play a major role. Amongst the relevant reports in the literature on shear-free flows of doughs in general are those of Bloksma [14], based on alveograph-type techniques, Uthayakumaran et al [15,16], based on uniaxial extension, Bagley et al [17] based on uniaxial compression and Dobrasczyk [18] and Charalambides et al [19,20] based on the bubble-inflation technique, but all deal with systems in which the dough shows gluten development, which is not the case in this work.…”
Section: Extensional Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, the foaming process upon baking is essentially a biaxial extensional deformation while during dough mixing uniaxial extension and/or compression play a major role. Amongst the relevant reports in the literature on shear-free flows of doughs in general are those of Bloksma [14], based on alveograph-type techniques, Uthayakumaran et al [15,16], based on uniaxial extension, Bagley et al [17] based on uniaxial compression and Dobrasczyk [18] and Charalambides et al [19,20] based on the bubble-inflation technique, but all deal with systems in which the dough shows gluten development, which is not the case in this work.…”
Section: Extensional Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Charalambides et al [10] used a purely rubber-elastic model of the Mooney-Rivlin type to discuss biaxial stretching with some success, but the model clearly cannot describe partial recoil or small-strain oscillatory behaviour. Leonard et al [11] have also tried to use a Mooney-Rivlin model, but the results are not completely successful.…”
Section: Introduction To Bread Dough Modellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4,8,10 It is designed to operate at constant volumetric air flow rates which vary between 10 and 2000 ml min −1 , corresponding to maximum strain rates of 0.001-0.2 s −1 ; the lower limit approaches rates of baking expansion, 4 unlike the Alveograph that operates at strain rates in the range of 0.1-1 s −1 , which are at least 100-fold higher than those occurring in actual baking processes. 11 The assumptions currently employed to derive strain hardening parameters using the DIS have been criticised by Charalambides et al 12,13 and, more recently, the facility to inflate doughs at an approximately constant strain rate has been introduced, 10 arguably improving the validity of the analysis whereby rheological parameters are derived (see Appendix). The constant strain rate is achieved (approximately) through an algorithm in the software that exponentially increases the rate of travel of the piston that drives the inflation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%