2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration

Abstract: Several studies have investigated whether vestibular signals can be processed to determine the magnitude of passive body motions. Many of them required subjects to report their perceived displacements offline, i.e., after being submitted to passive displacements. Here, we used a protocol that allowed us to complement these results by asking subjects to report their introspective estimation of their displacement continuously, i.e., during the ongoing body rotation. To this end, participants rotated the handle o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gain factors were below 1 (mean ϳ0.7), indicating a general underestimation of translation, which is in line with a general underestimation of distance traveled (Tremblay et al 2013). However, performance was better than previously found with passive sinusoidal translations (Clemens et al 2012), suggesting that the content of vestibular feedback (sinusoidal vs. transient) and task conditions affect updating performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Gain factors were below 1 (mean ϳ0.7), indicating a general underestimation of translation, which is in line with a general underestimation of distance traveled (Tremblay et al 2013). However, performance was better than previously found with passive sinusoidal translations (Clemens et al 2012), suggesting that the content of vestibular feedback (sinusoidal vs. transient) and task conditions affect updating performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On the basis of recent evidence that vestibular processing is involved in changing the visuo-spatial perspective and in self-other discrimination, Deroualle and Lopez ( 2014 ) propose a vestibular contribution to several sensorimotor mechanisms that are important for social cognition. Psychological investigations have recently demonstrated how vestibular information may play a role in spatial cognition like mental imagery, bodily self-consciousness and self-motion perception, including its influences on emotional aspects and mood as reported by Mast et al ( 2014 ), Pfeiffer et al ( 2014 ), and Tremblay et al ( 2013 ), with an overview of the higher cognitive processes of self-consciousness. Mast et al ( 2014 ) also reports how vestibular disorders and some psychiatric symptoms may be entangled, completing the review of Gurvich et al ( 2013 ).…”
Section: Spatial Cognition Bodily and Self-motion Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On the whole, we suggest that the effect of asymmetric rotation on central processing is responsible for the perceptual persistent asymmetry and that the preceding fast rotation is the critical factor responsible for keeping the gain of the slow responses down. When contrasting high and low frequencies are delivered in combination or in sequence, as with the stimulus used here, the perception of higher over lower frequency rotations is favored ( Massot et al 2012 ; Panichi et al 2011 ; Pettorossi et al 2013 ; Tremblay et al 2013 ). This centrally mediated phenomenon due to frequency contrast selectively affects perception of self-motion but not reflex function such as the VOR, and our present results demonstrate that the loss of unilateral peripheral vestibular input preserves this central adaptive property.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%