1998
DOI: 10.3109/17453679808997779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biases in a randomized comparison of three types of screw fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, coxofemoral arthroplasty was performed. Like Alho et al 16 , 17 and Austdal et al (18) , we did not indicate osteosynthesis for elderly patients with displaced fractures. The very high reoperation rate and relatively long immobilization time make osteosynthesis a poor option.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these cases, coxofemoral arthroplasty was performed. Like Alho et al 16 , 17 and Austdal et al (18) , we did not indicate osteosynthesis for elderly patients with displaced fractures. The very high reoperation rate and relatively long immobilization time make osteosynthesis a poor option.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the biomechanical study conducted by Walker et al (15) , using only two screws was deemed sufficient. Alhol et al 16 , 17 and Austdal et al (18) also did not find any difference between using two and three screws, and observed a failure rate of around 14% both for two and for three screws, while in our study, the failure rate from using two screws was 13.3%. The failure rate that we found in cases of osteosynthesis of fractures in young patients was similar to what has been found by other authors, such as Henari et al (19) , whose sample of 12 patients presented failure in 25% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…In the biomechanical study conducted by Walker et al (15) , using only two screws was deemed sufficient. Alhol et al (16,17) and Austdal et al (18) also did not find any difference between using two and three screws, and observed a failure rate of around 14% both for two and for three screws, while in our study, the failure rate from using two screws was 13.3%. The failure rate that we found in cases of osteosynthesis of fractures in young patients was similar to what has been found by other authors, such as Henari et al (19) , whose sample of 12 patients presented failure in 25% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In these cases, coxofemoral arthroplasty was performed. Like Alho et al (16,17) and Austdal et al (18) , we did not indicate osteosynthesis for elderly patients with displaced fractures. The very high reoperation rate and relatively long immobilization time make osteosynthesis a poor option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several studies have compared the use of different PTS configurations for the fixation of femoral neck fractures [ 3 , 17 – 20 ], but few have been published to compare the mechanical stability of the different screws configurations used in the unstable femoral neck fractures. Schaefer et al [ 21 ] demonstrated that replacing the posterior PTS with a FTS in femoral neck fracture with posterior comminution showed a potential benefit compared with the three PTS fixation models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%