2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-008-9209-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biased 14C-derived organic carbon turnover estimates following black carbon input to soil: an exploration with RothC

Abstract: The radiocarbon signature of the atmosphere is frequently used as a tracer to derive and validate turnover estimates of soil organic carbon (SOC). Such models often rely on steady-state assumptions and presume a direct correspondence between the atmospheric signature of CO 2 and that of residues entering the soil with or without a time-lag. The input of combustion products either from recent (i.e. charcoal) or fossil sources (e.g. diesel soot) violates this premise on account of its non-continuous delivery ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, whereas most of their soils were only slightly contaminated, Jenkinson et al (1992) found three Rothamsted soils to have c. 500 g carbonised C m -2 , 10 times greater than the majority. Leifeld (2008) carried out simulations with the Roth-C 26.3 model (Coleman and Jenkinson 1999) of the effects of black carbon on apparent soil C turnover, and reported under-or over-estimation of C turnover rates by up to 30%, i.e. a similar magnitude to the results reported here.…”
Section: "Black Carbon" and Coalsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For example, whereas most of their soils were only slightly contaminated, Jenkinson et al (1992) found three Rothamsted soils to have c. 500 g carbonised C m -2 , 10 times greater than the majority. Leifeld (2008) carried out simulations with the Roth-C 26.3 model (Coleman and Jenkinson 1999) of the effects of black carbon on apparent soil C turnover, and reported under-or over-estimation of C turnover rates by up to 30%, i.e. a similar magnitude to the results reported here.…”
Section: "Black Carbon" and Coalsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, the 13 C method can only be used when there are detectable changes in d 13 C after years of successive C 3 versus C 4 vegetation change, and 14 C dating could more accurately estimate C turnover of soil fractions when soils are under steady-state conditions or 14 C inputs derived from atmosphere and vegetation are well documented. It is noticeable that when using the 14 C dating method the presence of black C in soils could bias C turnover times of coarse organic matter, which is considered to be labile and has short turnover times (Baisden et al, 2002;Leifeld, 2008;Leifeld et al, 2015). Overall, these findings suggest that consideration should be given to methodological differences when using C turnover data to inform and parameterize soil C models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the amount and age of BC incorporated, mean ages estimated by the model may be biased by up to 30% (Leifeld 2008). It should also be noted that the mean age resulting from the steady-state turnover model as used here and in other soil science applications differs from the notation usually used for 14 C-dated samples and hence does not refer to calibrated or conventional 14 C age.…”
Section: Calculation Of Mean Carbon Agementioning
confidence: 99%