2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.235319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-voltage-induced phase transition in bilayer quantum Hall ferromagnets

Abstract: We consider bilayer quantum Hall systems at total filling factor ν = 1 in presence of a bias voltage ∆v which leads to different filling factors in each layer. We use auxiliary field functional integral approach to study mean-field solutions and collective excitations around them. We find that at large layer separation, the collective excitations soften at a finite wave vector leading to the collapse of quasiparticle gap. Our calculations predict that as the bias voltage is increased, bilayer systems undergo a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
57
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(62 reference statements)
8
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the 111 wavefunction can easily accommodate layer imbalance. 60 In the paired-CF phase, on the other hand, this type of perturbation (like a Zeeman field in a traditional superconductor) is clearly pair breaking since the ↑ and ↓ Fermi surfaces would be of different sizes (Although in principle more exotic types of pairing could be constructed to accommodate such differences). A much more interesting question to ask is what happens in the regime where there are both CFs and CBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the 111 wavefunction can easily accommodate layer imbalance. 60 In the paired-CF phase, on the other hand, this type of perturbation (like a Zeeman field in a traditional superconductor) is clearly pair breaking since the ↑ and ↓ Fermi surfaces would be of different sizes (Although in principle more exotic types of pairing could be constructed to accommodate such differences). A much more interesting question to ask is what happens in the regime where there are both CFs and CBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joglekar and MacDonald find that the collective mode spectrum stiffens and the critical d / ᐉ increases quadratically with ⌬ v , the splitting between the single-particle ground states in the two quantum wells. Since the interlayer capacitance in the T = 1 coherent phase is only slightly renormalized, 26 ⌬ v is essentially proportional to ⌬N / N T . The dashed line in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Joglekar and MacDonald 26 offer a quantitative prediction for the shape of the phase boundary. In their Hartree-Fock theory the magneto-roton minimum in the collective mode spectrum of the strongly coupled phase deepens as d / ᐉ increases, signaling incipient instability against charge density wave formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical dispersions ω(q) display characteristic magnetoroton (MR) minima at finite wave-vectors (q ∼ l −1 B ) that are due to excitonic binding terms of the Coulomb interactions in the neutral pairs [3,4]. It has been predicted that MRs can soften and create instabilities leading to quantum phase transitions that transform the ground-states into highly correlated electron phases [3,5,6,7,8,9].Coupled electron bilayers at total Landau level filling factor ν T =1 exhibit a rich quantum phase diagram due to the interplay of transition energies ∆ SAS across the tunneling gap with intra-and inter-layer interactions [5,8,10,11,12,13]. Interactions drive quantum phase transitions from the incompressible ferromagnetic quantized Hall phase, stable at low inter-layer spacing d or large ∆ SAS , to a compressible phase that results from the collapse of the many-body tunneling gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%