1994
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in the Coding of Hospital Discharge Data and Its Implications for Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
188
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
188
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous validation studies of this data source demonstrated high accuracy (23)(24)(25). Data abstracting and coding errors could be present, but improvements in coding accuracy over time would be expected to identify more patients with RA in more recent years, rather than fewer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, previous validation studies of this data source demonstrated high accuracy (23)(24)(25). Data abstracting and coding errors could be present, but improvements in coding accuracy over time would be expected to identify more patients with RA in more recent years, rather than fewer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Reabstraction studies that have compared OSHPD data files with original medical records have found specificities for diagnoses ranging from 0.98 to 1.00, and sensitivities for diagnoses ranging from 0.88 to 1.00 (23)(24)(25). Because these data are based in part on those used for billing purposes, there is near-complete recording of major surgical procedures, although recording of minor procedures such as blood transfusions is less complete (23)(24)(25). To protect patient confidentiality, the data are anonymous, so validation of specific diagnoses and procedures in this study could not be performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the dataset is based on ICD-9 CM coding, there is the potential for diagnostic misclassification. While ICD-9 CM coding is generally considered to be highly specific and have a low false-positive rate, coding can also have low sensitivity, resulting in omission of cases [27] . This would imply that our calculated event rates are lower than actual rates, although this misclassification should not differ among the patient groups examined; therefore, our rate comparisons would still be valid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 These concerns, however, are mainly in the context of using administrative databases for assessment of the quality of care. In Victoria, it is standard practice for hospital coders to use the Australian Coding Standards (vol.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%