2020
DOI: 10.5817/sp2020-2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in Primary School Teachers’ Expectations of Students? A Study of General and Specific Bias Towards SES, Ethnicity and Gender

Abstract: Based on teachers' knowledge base of students, teacher expectations of students' (future) abilities and potential are shaped, in which bias may occur. This study investigates data on multiple attributes of 535 sixth-grade Flemish students to find out (1) whether teacher expectations of students' cognitive and non-cognitive attributes, of teacher-student relationships, and of parental involvement in education are biased, and (2) whether teachers differ in their expectation bias towards SES, ethnicity, and gende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The children's teachers answered this inventory, and only the first three subscales were applied for this study. However, the previous literature showed negative biases in the perception of teachers of students who belonged to a more disadvantaged SES in terms of lower expectations about their performance (Doyle et al 2023;Filp 1995;Sneyers and Mahieu 2020). Therefore, the CDI was applied in two moments: at the beginning and when the children were 18 months of age, and the growth delta was calculated for each child to control this bias (growth delta = 18-month score − initial score).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The children's teachers answered this inventory, and only the first three subscales were applied for this study. However, the previous literature showed negative biases in the perception of teachers of students who belonged to a more disadvantaged SES in terms of lower expectations about their performance (Doyle et al 2023;Filp 1995;Sneyers and Mahieu 2020). Therefore, the CDI was applied in two moments: at the beginning and when the children were 18 months of age, and the growth delta was calculated for each child to control this bias (growth delta = 18-month score − initial score).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%