2006
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444905040680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in cross-validated freeRfactors: mitigation of the effects of non-crystallographic symmetry

Abstract: Current methods of free R factor cross-validation assume that the structure factors of the test and working sets are independent of one another. This assumption is only an approximation when the modeled structure occupies anything less than the full asymmetric unit. Through progressive elimination of reflections from the working set, starting with those expected to be most correlated to the test set, small biases in free R can be measured, presumably because of over-sampling of the Fourier transform owing to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure factors of our free R test set were randomly selected before the model was built. Because of the 6-fold NCS in the asymmetric unit the test set for the free R is not completely independent of the working R set (41). Calculating a truly independent free R would be challenging and would require us to start over from the diffraction data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure factors of our free R test set were randomly selected before the model was built. Because of the 6-fold NCS in the asymmetric unit the test set for the free R is not completely independent of the working R set (41). Calculating a truly independent free R would be challenging and would require us to start over from the diffraction data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real space refinement was carried out manually using the Coot graphics program (15), followed by positional B-factor refinement in the Crystallography & NMR System (CNS) (9). Cross-validation is not reported, since the test reflections are related to working reflections by the 60-fold noncrystallographic symmetry (16).…”
Section: Fig 1 Calcium-binding Sites In Flock House Virus (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other, there are a number of hypothetical reasons that could decrease the reliability of R free statistics for low resolutions. For example, a smaller number of reflections may make test sets and corresponding statistics poorer, reflections from the test sets may be indirectly related to those from the work sets for structures with local symmetries (Fabiola et al, 2006; as discussed in x3.2, such structures are more frequent at lower resolutions) etc.…”
Section: R Free and Difference R Free à Rmentioning
confidence: 99%