2020
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2020.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-corrected estimates of glacier thickness in the Columbia River Basin, Canada

Abstract: Several global datasets of glacier thickness exist, but the number of observations from western Canada are sparse and spatially biased. To supplement these limited observations, we measured ice thickness with ice penetrating radar on five glaciers in the Columbia Mountains, Canada. Our radar surveys, when combined with previous surveys for two glaciers in the Rocky Mountains, total 182 km of transects that represent 34 672 point measurements of ice thickness. Our measurements are, on average, 38% thicker than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of glacier thickness are increasingly incorporating mass conservation and global satellite remote-sensing datasets, but there remains an outstanding need for additional thickness measurements to both validate and refine those models' underlying assumptions (e.g., Farinotti et al, 2019;Pelto et al, 2020). Our synthesis suggests a higher upper limit (~30 MHz) on potentially suitable radar sounders for sounding temperate ice up to ~700 m thick.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Models of glacier thickness are increasingly incorporating mass conservation and global satellite remote-sensing datasets, but there remains an outstanding need for additional thickness measurements to both validate and refine those models' underlying assumptions (e.g., Farinotti et al, 2019;Pelto et al, 2020). Our synthesis suggests a higher upper limit (~30 MHz) on potentially suitable radar sounders for sounding temperate ice up to ~700 m thick.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ice thickness measurements from ice penetrating radar (IPR) are available from B. M. Pelto, Maussion, Menounos, Radić, and Zeuner (2020) for the three glaciers, with uncertainty estimated between 5-10% depending on the quality of the bed reflection. We also use modeled ice thickness from Farinotti et al (2019) and B. M. Pelto et al (2020).…”
Section: Ice Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ice thickness in western North America, Farinotti et al (2019), hereafter referred to as FAR19, use three models (Frey et al, 2014;Huss & Farinotti, 2012;Maussion et al, 2019). B. M. Pelto et al (2020) optimized distributed ice thickness for all three study glaciers using a cross-validation approach to minimize error between observed and modeled ice thickness with the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) (Maussion et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ice Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations