2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2018.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-compensated constrained least mean square adaptive filter algorithm for noisy input and its performance analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the variable 𝜎 2 represents the same small value in Equation (5). The variable 𝜆 > 0 is a scale parameter and 𝛼 > 0is the shape parameter.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the variable 𝜎 2 represents the same small value in Equation (5). The variable 𝜆 > 0 is a scale parameter and 𝛼 > 0is the shape parameter.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conventional LMS algorithms have good performance against Gaussian noise, their convergence performance is largely affected by other noises, especially impulse noise. Various adaptive algorithms for impulse noise [3], such as the sign algorithm [4], bias-compensate algorithms [5], and the family of logarithmic cost algorithms [6,7], have been investigated to improve system robustness. Some adaptive algorithms use a step-size scaler presented by modifying the tan h cost function to exclude the effects of impulsive samples [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with traditional adaptive algorithm models, bias-compensated algorithms consider the influence of input and output noises simultaneously. Simulation results and performance analysis suggest that bias-compensated algorithms exhibit better performance than tra-ditional adaptive algorithms [2][3][4][5][6]. The family of the kernel adaptive algorithm demonstrates excellent performance in terms of online prediction and nonlinear problems [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At present, classical algorithms employed against pulse noise include the deviation compensation algorithm [18], the symbolic algorithm [19], the logarithmic cost function algorithm [20], a series of algorithms based on the generalized maximum correntropy criterion [21], and the affine projection algorithm [22], among others. In [23], the affine projection generalized maximum correntropy filtering algorithm was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%