2019
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0771a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias and Confounding in Studies of Chronic Mental Health Effects from Mefloquine Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we believe Dr. Nevin’s comments 1 on our article 2 are unfounded. The strengths and limitations of our study are noted in the Discussion section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, we believe Dr. Nevin’s comments 1 on our article 2 are unfounded. The strengths and limitations of our study are noted in the Discussion section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a letter to the editor 1 commenting on our article 2 on the association between antimalarial medications (including mefloquine) and health outcomes in veterans, three concerns with our analyses were presented. We disagree with the premise that the stated concerns diminish our findings as they are largely theoretical and lack empirical support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has developed the two-question White River Mefloquine Instrument (WRMI-2) to assist clinicians and researchers in assessing such exposure in a standardized manner. 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%