2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2011.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bialgebras for structural operational semantics: An introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach to more powerful recursive definition principles are abstract operational rules (see [27] for an overview). It has been shown that certain rule formats define operations on the rational fixpoint [13,32], and it should be investigated whether a similar theory can be developed based on the LFF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to more powerful recursive definition principles are abstract operational rules (see [27] for an overview). It has been shown that certain rule formats define operations on the rational fixpoint [13,32], and it should be investigated whether a similar theory can be developed based on the LFF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [23] for an overview of this topic. In the remainder of this paper, we assume a fixed signature Σ with associated free monad T , and a Set endofunctor F representing the type of behaviour.…”
Section: Bialgebraic Operational Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides enough structure to prove at this general level that bisimilarity is a congruence. By instantiating the theory to concrete instances, one can then obtain congruence formats for systems such as probabilistic automata, weighted transition systems and streams-see [23] for an overview. Another advantage of abstract GSOS is that bisimulation up to context is "compatible" [34,33], providing a sound enhancement of the bisimulation proof method which can be combined with other compatible enhancements such as bisimulation up to bisimilarity [39,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting it yet differently, a reactive T-algebra is a δ-bialgebra for the given δ [12] (see also [18]). …”
Section: Reactive T-algebras and T-automatamentioning
confidence: 99%