2015
DOI: 10.1127/pfg/2015/0259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-temporal Change Detection, Change Trajectories and Time Series Analysis for Forest Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bi‐temporal comparison is the most widely used approach to change‐detection (Hussain et al, ; Lu et al, ; Tewkesbury et al, ) but it is also the most simplistic. Temporal trajectory analysis would give more insight into whether continuous change is occurring and in which direction (Coppin et al, ; Czerwinski, King, & Mitchell, ; Thonfeld, Hecheltjen, & Menz, ). This approach was not used in this case because the timespan of the dataset was too short to expect to see continuous change, phenological conditions are not comparable between images, and the study area would be reduced to the area of the imagery captured at the highest tide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi‐temporal comparison is the most widely used approach to change‐detection (Hussain et al, ; Lu et al, ; Tewkesbury et al, ) but it is also the most simplistic. Temporal trajectory analysis would give more insight into whether continuous change is occurring and in which direction (Coppin et al, ; Czerwinski, King, & Mitchell, ; Thonfeld, Hecheltjen, & Menz, ). This approach was not used in this case because the timespan of the dataset was too short to expect to see continuous change, phenological conditions are not comparable between images, and the study area would be reduced to the area of the imagery captured at the highest tide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Same was observed in the wet season for year 2015. In general, the quality and density of vegetation [4,18,19] cover for the study area on an average, was higher in 2015 and 2017 for the wet and dry seasons, respectively.…”
Section: Normalized Difference Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite these benefits, it still raises specific challenges regarding: the irregular temporal phenological signature of different land cover types; the insufficient sampling used to train the supervised classification; the missing temporal data [42]; the network architectures or specific datasets shaping that need to be developed for exploiting the temporal information jointly with the spatial and spectral information of the data [47]. Thus, in a more classical way, other sets of approaches and methods can be used varying from manual change interpretation [48] to bi-temporal linear data transformation [49] or multi-temporal spectral mixture analysis [50] and deep learning [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%