The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-013-0669-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Sobolev homeomorphism with zero Jacobian almost everywhere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note also that, if 1 ≤ p < n, then there are very pathological examples of Sobolev homeomorphisms with the Jacobian equal zero a.e. The first such example was constructed by Hencl [20], see also [5,8].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note also that, if 1 ≤ p < n, then there are very pathological examples of Sobolev homeomorphisms with the Jacobian equal zero a.e. The first such example was constructed by Hencl [20], see also [5,8].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chain rule. The main result of [8] (see also [33]) provides an example of a surjective homeomorphism f : (0, 1) n → (0, 1) n , n ≥ 3, such that f ∈ W 1,1 , f −1 ∈ W 1,1 and J f = 0 a.e., J f −1 = 0 a.e. Note that f −1 • f = Id, but the chain rule…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us then concentrate ourselves on (4). Assume that x is a Lebesgue point for Du, and that J u (x) = 0; as a consequence, if we call y = u(x) then we have that Du −1 (y) exists and coincides with the inverse of Du(x).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Known Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us also recall that the Jacobian of a W 1,p , 1 ≤ p < n, Sobolev homeomorphism may behave strangely as it may vanish a.e. (see [22], [11] and [17]). As mentioned before the Jacobian of a homeomorphism cannot change sign if p > [n/2] by [24] and therefore the method of sign-changing Jacobian for providing a counterexample in Theorem 1.1 cannot be improved to p > [n/2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%