2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective optimization of water management in shale gas exploration with uncertainty: A case study from Sichuan, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the proportion of freshwater usage increases when decision maker wants to decrease the economic costs and fix the satisfaction degree for uncertain constraints. As a result, the environmental costs increase (Ren et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limited Data Resources and Optimal Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the proportion of freshwater usage increases when decision maker wants to decrease the economic costs and fix the satisfaction degree for uncertain constraints. As a result, the environmental costs increase (Ren et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limited Data Resources and Optimal Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the first stage, the resolution of the uncertain parameters is dependent on the development decisions. Therefore, the nonanticipativity constraint is called conditional nonanticipativity constraint (18). To model the conditional NACs, GDP is adopted.…”
Section: Conditional Nonanticipativity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drouven et al 17 Since hydraulic fracturing requires large amounts of water and produces a sizeable amount of flowback, there are several works concentrating on water management in shale gas development under uncertainty. Ren et al 18 investigate all the key water-consuming phases in shale gas production and optimize the freshwater use and flowback water control. In their work, a bi-criterion programming model considering both water volume and economic parameter uncertainties are used to define the optimal trade-offs between economic and environmental objectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CWT facilities accept and treat UOG wastewater for disposal, discharge, reuse, recycling, or material recovery. 17 As compared to decentralized, on-site wastewater treatment, CWT facilities have better economics of scale and encounter fewer regulatory barriers, 18 because a high wastewater volume is treated, and only a single water quality standard is needed for the entire facility. Like DWI, however, the UOG wastewater needs to be transported to the CWT facility, resulting in transportation costs that render the feasibility of centralized UOG wastewater treatment questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%