2023
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11081492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Objective Integrated Scheduling of Quay Cranes and Automated Guided Vehicles

Abstract: Operational efficiency is one of the key performance indicators of a port’s service level. In the process of making scheduling plans for container terminals, different types of equipment are usually scheduled separately. The interaction between quay cranes (QCs) and automated guided vehicles (AGVs) is neglected, which results in low operational efficiency. This research explores the integrated scheduling problem of QCs and AGVs. Firstly, a multi-objective mixed integer programming model (MOMIP) is conducted, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, they weighted the two objectives when implementing the solution method, posing challenges to ensuring the reasonable allocation of objective weights. Duan et al [13] established a multiobjective integrated scheduling model targeting overall makespan and AGV unloading time. They employed NSGA-II to obtain a noninferior solution set, demonstrating superior results compared to the weighted method under a large number of tasks.…”
Section: Integrated Scheduling In Container Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, they weighted the two objectives when implementing the solution method, posing challenges to ensuring the reasonable allocation of objective weights. Duan et al [13] established a multiobjective integrated scheduling model targeting overall makespan and AGV unloading time. They employed NSGA-II to obtain a noninferior solution set, demonstrating superior results compared to the weighted method under a large number of tasks.…”
Section: Integrated Scheduling In Container Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2022) investigated the AGV scheduling problem considering bidirectional paths in ACTs and designed a branch-and-bound algorithm to generate conflict-free routes and minimize the total completion time [4]. Duan et al (2023) studied the AGV scheduling problem considering the interaction with QC, and a mixed integrated programming model was established with the goal of minimizing the completion time of ships and the idle time of AGVs [5]. studied the AGV scheduling problem under the sea rail intermodal transportation model and established a mixed integer programming model to minimize equipment energy consumption [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the conventional AGV scheduling [1][2][3][4][5], when studying the AGV scheduling problem in a new type of automated container terminal, it is necessary to pay attention to its battery consumption, ensuring that the depleted AGVs can be restored in a timely manner while completing their task, thereby ensuring the smooth completion of container transportation. At the same time, it is necessary to consider the charging capacity of the terminal to avoid congestion of AGVs with depleted batteries at the battery-swapping station and consider factors that affect the energy consumption of AGVs, such as their driving speed, often influenced by the traffic environment in different areas of the terminal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yue et al [13] established a two-phase mathematical model for dual-trolley QCs and AGVs by considering constraints such as vessel stability and aiming at the total energy consumption during loading and discharging operations. Duan et al [14] developed a two-phase mathematical model for the integrated scheduling problem for the QCs and AGVs to minimize the makespan and the unloaded time of AGVs. The related research results are valuable for the improvement of the overall operation efficiency and energy consumption optimization of terminals, but there is still a lack of specific depictions of the operation flow of AGV subsystems and related constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%