2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6544-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective Cross-Layer Design Using Different Optimization Methods in Multi-flow Ad-Hoc Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt a slightly similar system model as the one used in our previous works. 7,8 In particular, we simulate a general interconnected multiple session ad hoc network modeled by a directed acyclic graph γ = {N,L,M} with three parameters. In this notation, N represents the set of dedicated static nodes in the network with different capabilities and specifications that transmit data through their neighbors using a set of L internode communication links.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adopt a slightly similar system model as the one used in our previous works. 7,8 In particular, we simulate a general interconnected multiple session ad hoc network modeled by a directed acyclic graph γ = {N,L,M} with three parameters. In this notation, N represents the set of dedicated static nodes in the network with different capabilities and specifications that transmit data through their neighbors using a set of L internode communication links.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem formulated as a convex optimization problem was evaluated using the subgradient projection procedure by deriving a distributed iterative algorithm. Moreover in another work, 8 we employed three different numerical methods, namely, active‐set, interior‐point, and sequential quadratic programming (SQP) procedures to solve a bi‐objective nonlinear optimization program subject to the underlying network functional constraints in the challenged networking paradigm.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation