2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21093088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Directional Mutual Energy Trade between Smart Grid and Energy Districts Using Renewable Energy Credits

Abstract: A central authority, in a conventional centralized energy trading market, superintends energy and financial transactions. The central authority manages and controls transparent energy trading between producer and consumer, imposes a penalty in case of contract violation, and disburses numerous rewards. However, the management and control through the third party pose a significant threat to the security and privacy of consumers’/producers’ (participants) profiles. The energy transactions between participants in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blockchain technology has been adopted for many different fields in which there is a need to exchange some valuable assets. Most notably, there are blockchain-based solution proposed for smart grids [ 156 , 157 ], healthcare and telemedicine [ 158 ], smart insurance [ 159 ], vehicular energy networks [ 160 ], databases [ 158 , 161 ], cloud computing [ 162 ], software-defined networks [ 163 ], wireless sensor networks [ 164 ], trading energy contracts [ 165 ] and livestream video transmissions [ 166 ]. Some of these solutions use existing implementations of public blockchains, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, and some use their own systems.…”
Section: Secure Data Transmission Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blockchain technology has been adopted for many different fields in which there is a need to exchange some valuable assets. Most notably, there are blockchain-based solution proposed for smart grids [ 156 , 157 ], healthcare and telemedicine [ 158 ], smart insurance [ 159 ], vehicular energy networks [ 160 ], databases [ 158 , 161 ], cloud computing [ 162 ], software-defined networks [ 163 ], wireless sensor networks [ 164 ], trading energy contracts [ 165 ] and livestream video transmissions [ 166 ]. Some of these solutions use existing implementations of public blockchains, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, and some use their own systems.…”
Section: Secure Data Transmission Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also ensures data integrity, data ownership, and a trusted data source [ 158 ]. The peer-to-peer nature of the transactions in blockchain-based systems bypasses third parties’ participation in the process, which eliminates the single-point-of-failure problem [ 157 ], could positively affect user anonymity, protecting their privacy [ 158 ], and could lead to an overall less expensive system [ 157 ].…”
Section: Secure Data Transmission Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed SA-SLA with bi-directional communication, real-time monitoring, service security, and multiple contracts assures a balance between energy demand and energy supply. CM regulates the actions of stakeholders by enforcing their energy activities under SA-SLA by specifying typical rewards and penalties as mentioned in (6). The typical block diagram of SA-SLA is shown in Fig 2 . Layers play an important role in appropriately regulating the performance of emergent distribution links [2].…”
Section: Stochastic Adaptive-service Level Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the integration and control of small-scale prosumer-based microgrids in the paradigm of the Internet of Things and demand-side management is a crucial challenge for the future smart grid [ 3 ]. The challenge of secure energy trading for blockchain-based peer-to-peer microgrids is addressed in [ 4 6 ]. Smart contracts ensure beneficial mutual energy transactions between the smart grid and prosumers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We came across the work of, who used PSO and GA for neighbor‐selection in peer‐to‐peer networks and found out that GA obtained better results 20 . Similarly, Rehman et al 21 employed GA and PSO to optimize the peer‐to‐peer energy transactions in a decentralized energy trading market and saw that GA results outperformed the PSO ones. GA was also combined with PSO for device‐to‐device (D2D) communication in advanced communication networks 22 .…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%