2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-022-00887-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-directional Control of Synaptic Input Summation and Spike Generation by GABAergic Inputs at the Axon Initial Segment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering our observation that in vivo chemogenetic silencing of ChCs only mildly increased L2/3 PyC activity, their electrical contribution to vetoing action potential output seems, if anything, limited and affects only a small proportion of cells. These findings are thus in contrast with the general notion that ChCs exert powerful control over PyC output (29,79), but consistent with computational simulations predicting a relatively small inhibitory effect of GABAergic innervation of the AIS, possibly involving shunting inhibition (80,81). One explanation for the weak effects we observed is the high variability in the number of GABAergic boutons that PyCs receive at their AISs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Considering our observation that in vivo chemogenetic silencing of ChCs only mildly increased L2/3 PyC activity, their electrical contribution to vetoing action potential output seems, if anything, limited and affects only a small proportion of cells. These findings are thus in contrast with the general notion that ChCs exert powerful control over PyC output (29,79), but consistent with computational simulations predicting a relatively small inhibitory effect of GABAergic innervation of the AIS, possibly involving shunting inhibition (80,81). One explanation for the weak effects we observed is the high variability in the number of GABAergic boutons that PyCs receive at their AISs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Considering our observation that in vivo chemogenetic silencing of ChCs only mildly increased L2/3 PyC activity, their electrical contribution to vetoing AP output seems, if anything, limited and affects only a small proportion of cells. These findings are thus in contrast with the general notion that ChCs exert powerful control over PyC output ( Jung et al, 2022 ; Gallo et al, 2020 ), but consistent with computational simulations predicting a relatively small inhibitory effect of GABAergic innervation of the AIS, possibly involving shunting inhibition ( Douglas and Martin, 1990 ; Shang et al, 2023 ). One explanation for the weak effects we observed is the high variability in the number of GABAergic boutons that PyCs receive at their AISs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%