2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-directional channel modeling for implantable UHF–RFID transceivers in brain–computer interface applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller size of an ultrasonic transducer is an added advantage for applications such BCI. In Opnet, the ultrasonic technology parameters [29] were used to transmit data. The simulation is performed using the same procedure as described for the UHF and UWB.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller size of an ultrasonic transducer is an added advantage for applications such BCI. In Opnet, the ultrasonic technology parameters [29] were used to transmit data. The simulation is performed using the same procedure as described for the UHF and UWB.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article considers a BCI system, where N T transceivers on the brain surface to collect and transmit the EEG brain signals, and N R transceivers are placed on the scalp to acquire the transmitted signals. The sensors used are semiactive, and [26], [27], ultra-wideband RFID (UWB-RFID) [28], [29], and ultrasonic technology mimicking the neural dusts by modifying the superframe structure [15], [30], [31].…”
Section: Bci System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important criterion for this is the introduction and application of wireless methods by Radio frequency identification (RFID) and Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) technology. Combining the method we have developed, the RFID and DTN processes allows us to create an even more complex brain machine interface [30,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BCIs interpret neural activity (Berger et al 2007), contrasting with Computer-Brain Interfaces that stimulate neural activity (Allison, Wolpaw, and Wolpaw 2007) and with bi-directional interfaces (Al Ajrawi et al 2018;Lajoie et al 2017;London et al 2008;Mavoori et al 2005;O'Doherty et al 2011). This research focuses on BCIs, although clearly there is a range of ethical implications arising from CBIs and bi-directional interfaces (for example, the effects of stimulating neural activity on autonomy and agency).…”
Section: Brain-computer Interfaces 30mentioning
confidence: 99%