IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2013.6577701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-criteria strategies for business processes scheduling in cloud environments with fairness metrics

Abstract: International audienceThe Cloud computing paradigm is adopted for its several advantages like reduction of cost incurred when using a set of resources. Despite the many proven benefits of using a Cloud infrastructure to run business processes, it is still faced with a major problem that can compromise its success: the lack of guidance for choosing between multiple offerings. To ensure this, we propose a set of algorithms for business process scheduling in Cloud computing environments. More precisely, we propos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the authors in [5] extend their approach already presented [4] to execute several instances of workflows concurrently. The proposed approach allows to ensure fairness between the various workflow instances.…”
Section: ) Scheduling Multiple Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the authors in [5] extend their approach already presented [4] to execute several instances of workflows concurrently. The proposed approach allows to ensure fairness between the various workflow instances.…”
Section: ) Scheduling Multiple Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Abrishami et al [1] Bessai et al [4] Jayadivya et al [9] Chopra et al [12] Jianfang et al [ 18] Jayadivya et al [17] Singh et al [30] Caron et al [10] Jung et al [20] Bessai et al [5] Bittencourt et al [7] Jiang et al [19] Kumar et al [22] Malawski et al [23] Pietri et al [28] Varalakshmi et al [31] Single WF…”
Section: Wf: Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this approach makes use of a similar resource model as done by the SWF approaches discussed above. The same applies to the work by Bessai et al (2013), who also assume that workflows are composed from single software services. The authors propose different methods to optimize resource allocation and scheduling, aiming at cost or time optimization or to find a pareto-optimal solution covering both cost and time.…”
Section: Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because workflows are not able to concurrently share service instances, the potential for optimization of resource allocation is not completely exploited. Similar to Bessai et al (2013), Wei et al also do not implement a testbed to test their algorithms, but use simulation in their evaluation. Despite the differences between our work and the work by Wei et al, there are also some commonalities, e.g., to allow different sizes of VMs at proportional cost.…”
Section: Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within their scheduling, the authors consider cost for VMs as well as data transfer cost. Bessai et al aim at cost or time optimization or a pareto-optimal solution covering both aspects [37]. Wei et al allow generic QoS constraints, but do not explicitly discuss deadline-constrained scheduling [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%