2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03542-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-Abduction with Pure Properties for Specification Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the soundness of this lemma immediately follows from the soundness of second-order abduction [28,45].…”
Section: Sound Invariant Inferencementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the soundness of this lemma immediately follows from the soundness of second-order abduction [28,45].…”
Section: Sound Invariant Inferencementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Inferring Predicate Invariant Our invariant inference is based on the principle of secondorder abduction [28,45]. Given the predicate P defined by m branches as P(t) ≡ m i=1 ∆ i , we assume a sound invariant of P as an unknown (second-order ) variable I(t).…”
Section: Sound Invariant Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, bi-abduction has been applied to different forms of program reasoning, including: automatic verification of concurrent systems [Calcagno et al 2009a]; inference of pure information about weakly-specified data structures, such as size, sum or height [Trinh et al 2013]; and automatic synthesis of higher-order predicates for polymorphic data structures [Le et al 2014].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the disjunction of the bounded formulas is an under-approximation, the closure computed is an under-approximated base. To compute an over-approximation, we adopt the approach in [30]. In particular, first we transform the system of arithmetic inductive predicates into a system of constrained Horn clauses.…”
Section: Correctnessmentioning
confidence: 99%