2012
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.10.5323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bhopal Methyl Isocyanate Affected Population and Cancer Susceptibility: Where Do We Stand Now?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether exposure to MIC induces a site-specific cancer is still a point of much controversy (Senthilkumar et al, 2012). The bottleneck faced by the scientific community in this regard is mainly due to attempts on extrapolation of the data on the animals to human studies (Senthilkumar, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether exposure to MIC induces a site-specific cancer is still a point of much controversy (Senthilkumar et al, 2012). The bottleneck faced by the scientific community in this regard is mainly due to attempts on extrapolation of the data on the animals to human studies (Senthilkumar, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, another group who should be in the debate is the life-threatening chemical exposed people surviving with chronic respiratory disorders. Here, we emphasize one such population who faced the World's worst chemical disaster in 1984 in Bhopal (Figure 1), survived the deadly methyl isocyanate (MIC) exposure with multiple complications including cancers [5][6][7] , pulmonary function abnormalities 8 , and obstructive lung function 9 . Almost thirty-five years over, the MIC-exposed long-term survivors and their offspring born post-exposure (also referred to as the Bhopal MIC-affected population) and their health status remain controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…610) at the Bhopal Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) plant. This catastrophe took a toll of 3800 human lives instantly (Broughton, 2005) and about 0.2 million residents were exposed to MIC at high (over 27 ppm) to varying degrees of concentrations (Senthilkumar, 2012; Senthilkumar et al, 2013). Among the exposed survivors, 50,000 were expected to survive with long-term effects (Varma and Guest, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%