Bhabha Scattering: A Scientometric View

Kademani, B.S.; Surwase, Ganesh; Mohan, Lalit; Kumar, Vijay

doi:10.14429/djlit.29.255

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kalyane and Devarai [ 14] , Kalyane and Samanta [15] , Devarai and Ramesh [16] used the term 'informetrics' in the titles of their papers. However, there was continuous use of the phrase ''scientometric portrait'' to measure the scientific productivity of individual scientist except for Kademani, Kumbar & Surwase [ 17] who used the terms ''informetric portrait'' in the title of their paper. "Scientometric profiles" have also been used by the author in the title of his Ph.D. thesis to conduct a scientometric study considering some Indian scientists altogether [ 18] .…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Citation Impact of Bose's Paper Planck's Law and the Light Quantum Hypothesis

Mukhopadhyay

2024

IJLA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an overview of the most recent citation pattern in S.N. Bose's work on Planck's formula derivation and light quantum hypothesis, with a special focus on geographical distribution of citations received by him. This work is a quantitative assessment of the relevance and influence of the highly cited paper of the scientist under study and intends to ascertain from the number of citations received by Bose in later day publications. The main aim of this work is to assess how far pioneering S.N. Bose was and to trace how much perpetual quality has the derivation of Planck's formula, results and the value of results. Different potential source materials or tools such as Science Citation Index (SCI: five yearly cumulated hardcopy volumes) from 1945 onwards in the National Library of India in Calcutta, Websites including citation databases like Google Scholar etc. online have been consulted to prepare a citation history to his paper. The paper under study was further searched for citations as per Web of Science (SCI -online database) ranging from 1900 up to and including January, 2022. It can be concluded that a comparison may be made of the work of peer researchers in similar fields who have been bringing out for a wide range of time periods. But the distribution of citations limits their usefulness to pointing out the acuteness. Many a time delayed citations are not easily traceable as they occur highly scattered or via intermediary citations i.e. citing a source within a source (citing a secondary source of publication) that in turn cites the original. Furthermore, the time gap of the work of Bose and evidences in support of his interpretations is so large that the core (actual) citations to his fundamental works couldn't be detected.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Citation Impact of Bose's Paper Planck's Law and the Light Quantum Hypothesis

Mukhopadhyay

2024

IJLA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, in order to have an intuitively clearer representation with a mathematical meaning (see, Eqs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]), the authors proposed to use the graphical metric based on the 'square surface areas' which represents subsurface structural boundary for the documents published by 'A' or 'B' systems, and the co-publication produced together.…”

Section: A-bmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many scientometrics studies have been appeared in the literature dealing with the different aspects of scholarly communications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . Kademani et al [1] studied the growth and development of world literature on Bhabha Scattering by using three different databases 'International Nuclear Information System' (INIS), Science Citation Index, and INSPEC and found that a total of 1305 papers were published by the scientists in the field Bhabha Scattering during 1969-2008; and there were 47 countries involved in the research in this field where Germany was the top producing country with 421 papers followed by the USA with 420 papers, Italy with 293 papers, and Switzerland with 263 papers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kademani et al [1] studied the growth and development of world literature on Bhabha Scattering by using three different databases 'International Nuclear Information System' (INIS), Science Citation Index, and INSPEC and found that a total of 1305 papers were published by the scientists in the field Bhabha Scattering during 1969-2008; and there were 47 countries involved in the research in this field where Germany was the top producing country with 421 papers followed by the USA with 420 papers, Italy with 293 papers, and Switzerland with 263 papers. Magnone [4] studied R&D capability of environment friendly technologies in China, Japan, and Korea and found that a total of 788 papers were published during 1990-2011 in the field of water-gas shift 'WGS' technologies by scientists in China, Japan and Korea; where China was the top producing country with 394 papers (50%) followed by Japan with 250 papers (32%), and Korea with 144 papers (18%).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Indo-Korean Co-Publications: An Analysis Using Asymmetric (α) Index

Magnone¹,

Surwase²,

Kademani³

2017

J. Scientomet Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper concerns about the development and use of an asymmetric index (α) for the computation of the co-publications between two countries in a scientometric perspective. Korea and India are selected as assessing cases for illustrating the application of the 'α' index on co-publication analysis against several parameters such as growth in a number of the scholarly communications, document types, subject areas, and sources for the period 1994 to 2013. A total of 8823 co-publications were published by Indo-Korean researchers during the aforementioned period of time. The asymmetric index of Indo-Korean co-publications of India with Korea (α India-Korea ) and vice versa (α Korea-India ) were obtained and the values were 0.099 and 0.114, respectively. The results suggest that the overall efforts of Korean researchers have more effective co-operation with Indian researchers. In addition, a comparison with the best-known Salton's (cosine) measures is provided and the results show that its value (0.11) is independent of the relative size of the collaborative systems.

show abstract

Scientific productivity and Impact of Indian Polymer scientists (1992–2006): An Informetric study

Parvathamma¹,

Gobbur²

2011

Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bhabha Scattering: A Scientometric View

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Measuring Citation Impact of Bose's Paper Planck's Law and the Light Quantum Hypothesis

Measuring Citation Impact of Bose's Paper Planck's Law and the Light Quantum Hypothesis

Indo-Korean Co-Publications: An Analysis Using Asymmetric (α) Index

Scientific productivity and Impact of Indian Polymer scientists (1992–2006): An Informetric study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About