2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-Htc) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/r10-htc.2017.8289066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BFSp: A feature selection method for bug severity classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the similarity measure improved the severity prediction and fixer recommendation process. Sharmin et al [34] drafted a bug feature selection (BFS) technique by using Pareto optimality to classify the bugs into Blocker, Trivial, Critical, Minor, and Major classes by searing informative features. The performance was evaluated on three open source projects, i.e., Eclipse, GCC, and Mozilla, and results showed that the BFS technique performed better than existing techniques [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the similarity measure improved the severity prediction and fixer recommendation process. Sharmin et al [34] drafted a bug feature selection (BFS) technique by using Pareto optimality to classify the bugs into Blocker, Trivial, Critical, Minor, and Major classes by searing informative features. The performance was evaluated on three open source projects, i.e., Eclipse, GCC, and Mozilla, and results showed that the BFS technique performed better than existing techniques [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research works, as described in [21][22][23][24][25] employed different feature selection methods to minimize the number of informative features set and to enhance the accuracy of the classifier. All the works mentioned above paid particular attention to the effectiveness of feature selection techniques on the accuracy of classifying the severity of bug reports.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…create noise or be redundant. FS methods are used to remove such irrelevant and redundant features and can be divided into three broad categories namely Wrapper [14,18], Embedded [20], and Filter methods [13,15,16]. Among these, filter methods do not depend on a classifier to select a feature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%