2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-08084-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BF2SkNet: best deep learning features fusion-assisted framework for multiclass skin lesion classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, compared to the extended hybrid model + handcrafted feature model by Sharafudeen et al (2023) [38], our SkinSwinViT model significantly enhances predictive accuracy, precision, and specificity while maintaining a more parsimonious architecture, with improvements of 5.9%, 3.7%, and 1.6%, respectively. Furthermore, compared to the outstanding BF 2 SkNet model by Ajmal et al (2023) [43], our SkinSwinViT model demonstrates exceptional performance, with increases in accuracy and precision of 0.7% and 2.7%, respectively, under similar complexity conditions. These notable outcomes establish our SkinSwinViT model as the state-of-the-art method in the field of skin lesion classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, compared to the extended hybrid model + handcrafted feature model by Sharafudeen et al (2023) [38], our SkinSwinViT model significantly enhances predictive accuracy, precision, and specificity while maintaining a more parsimonious architecture, with improvements of 5.9%, 3.7%, and 1.6%, respectively. Furthermore, compared to the outstanding BF 2 SkNet model by Ajmal et al (2023) [43], our SkinSwinViT model demonstrates exceptional performance, with increases in accuracy and precision of 0.7% and 2.7%, respectively, under similar complexity conditions. These notable outcomes establish our SkinSwinViT model as the state-of-the-art method in the field of skin lesion classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…MobileNet+handcrafted features [36] 92.4 92.1 90.0 ResNet+Inceptionv3 [37] 85.1 79.6 82.91 Hybrid Model+handcrafted features [38] 91.9 94.1 97.7 Deep learning and moth flame optimization [39] 90.6 ----A CNN-based pigmented framework [40] 91.5 ----A CNN and nature-inspired optimization algorithm [41] 91.7 92.4 --Two-stream CNN framework [42] 96.5 ----BF 2 SkNet model [43] 97.1 95.1 --Proposed SkinSwinViT 97.8 97.8 99.3…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in Reference 31, presented the deep learning and feature selection based technique for skin lesion classification and obtained the improved accuracy of 85.1. In Reference 32, authors obtained the accuracy of 90.2% for ISIC2018 dataset. The proposed framework obtained an improved accuracy of 95.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic diagnosis is split into three steps: skin lesion preprocessing and boundary estimation, feature extraction/selection and lesion classification based on these features [ 8 , 9 ]. Researchers have used various preprocessing techniques in the past decade to preprocess medical images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%