Bezpieczeństwo pacjenta w opiece zdrowotnej

Health Security: Definition Problems

“…Twenty-eight studies were found that met the initial assumptions of health security. In the first approach, seven studies were rejected because they related to patient security in patient safety meaning [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Subsequently, another seventeen were denied, because the definition of health security was not actually discussed there or was limited to the literal quotation of other authors’ definitions [ 7 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”

Psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of the Questionnaire of Attitudes of Healthcare Workers towards Reporting of Clinical Adverse Events (P-RoCAES)

“…The Questionnaire -RoCAES by Wilson B., Bekker H.L., Fylan F. (Cronbach's alpha 0.83; Spearman's correlation 0.65) consisted of 25 statements to assess attitudes towards reporting clinical adverse events. These included five dimensions/subscales: feelings of guilt (6 items; number 5, 7, 12, 18, 21, 23), perceived criteria for identifying events to report (6 items; number 2, 3, 10, 14, 15, 20), perceived expectations of colleagues (6 items; number 6,9,11,19,22,25), perceived benefits of reporting adverse events (5 items; number 1,4,16,17,24), and perceived transparency of reporting procedures (2 items; number 8, 13). Respondents provided answers according to a Likert scale (1)(2)(3)(4), where 1 meant strongly agree and 4 meant strongly disagree.…”

“…These included five dimensions/subscales: feelings of guilt (6 items; number 5, 7, 12, 18, 21, 23), perceived criteria for identifying events to report (6 items; number 2, 3, 10, 14, 15, 20), perceived expectations of colleagues (6 items; number 6,9,11,19,22,25), perceived benefits of reporting adverse events (5 items; number 1,4,16,17,24), and perceived transparency of reporting procedures (2 items; number 8, 13). Respondents provided answers according to a Likert scale (1)(2)(3)(4), where 1 meant strongly agree and 4 meant strongly disagree. The values of all responses were then added up, with the scores rotated for 16 statements.…”

“…An adverse event is an unintentional or unexpected harm to a patient's health, or the risk of harm, as a result of ongoing diagnosis and/or treatment, which is not related to the patient's overall health or underlying disease [1]. Adverse events occur in every healthcare system.…”

“…A review of the domestic/Polish literature on the subject indicates a lack of standardized tools to reliably and accurately assess attitudes toward clinical adverse events. Although interest in adverse events has been growing in recent years [1,3,4] and opinions about adverse events have been studied [5,6]. There are foreign sources on the study of medical professionals' attitudes toward adverse events using standardized tools [7,8].…”