2017
DOI: 10.14361/9783839436721-015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beziehungen - Bruchstücke 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 tion, 38 the court determined that eligibility rules are presumptively procompetitive. 39 This concluded the matter in the district court, but Deppe appealed to the Seventh Circuit. In its decision, the Seventh Circuit began by observing that "[t]he year-in-residence requirement is an eligibility rule clearly meant to preserve the amateur character of college athletics and is therefore presumptively procompetitive under Board of Regents."…”
Section: The Seventh Circuit's Presumption Of Pro-competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 tion, 38 the court determined that eligibility rules are presumptively procompetitive. 39 This concluded the matter in the district court, but Deppe appealed to the Seventh Circuit. In its decision, the Seventh Circuit began by observing that "[t]he year-in-residence requirement is an eligibility rule clearly meant to preserve the amateur character of college athletics and is therefore presumptively procompetitive under Board of Regents."…”
Section: The Seventh Circuit's Presumption Of Pro-competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%