2016
DOI: 10.1177/0309132515613166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond white privilege

Abstract: This paper builds from scholarship on whiteness and white privilege to argue for an expanded focus that includes settler colonialism and white supremacy. We argue that engaging with white supremacy and settler colonialism reveals the enduring social, economic, and political impacts of white supremacy as a materially grounded set of practices. We situate white supremacy not as an artifact of history or as an extreme position, but rather as the foundation for the continuous unfolding of practices of race and rac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(109 reference statements)
1
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, "the creation of the West was the creation of White Supremacy" (Bonilla-Silva, 2001, p. 192). Thus, as White-Europeans used ideas of White superiority to expropriate, they became imbued with a sense of superiority from their expropriations in a reciprocal fashion (Bonds & Inwood, 2016). In fact, the lasting power of White supremacy depends upon its nebulous adaptability, as it is transformed and expressed throughout time in diverse ways.…”
Section: The Evolution Of White Supremacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, "the creation of the West was the creation of White Supremacy" (Bonilla-Silva, 2001, p. 192). Thus, as White-Europeans used ideas of White superiority to expropriate, they became imbued with a sense of superiority from their expropriations in a reciprocal fashion (Bonds & Inwood, 2016). In fact, the lasting power of White supremacy depends upon its nebulous adaptability, as it is transformed and expressed throughout time in diverse ways.…”
Section: The Evolution Of White Supremacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as an indicator of the political economy of land, we use a measure of the proportion of land per county that is owned by the federal government using the Gap Analysis Program Protected Areas Database v 10.3 (Gergeley and McKerrow 2013). The political economy of land tenure and management in the West includes federal policies that reserved large expanses of surface and subsurface resources for state ownership and management, and privileged a particular set of beneficiaries while dispossessing Native communities of their land and associated resources (White 1991, Wilkinson 1993, Robbins 1999, Gaido 2002, Hixson 2013, Bonds and Inwood 2016. Political economy cannot be measured directly, and so we use the proxy of federal land ownership to represent the 'footprint' of this legacy on the West (Spence 1999, Vincent et al 2017.…”
Section: Defining the West As A Social-ecological Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of factors may influence this. Significantly, there is already a well-established field of anti-racist geographies that has long engaged with geographical dimensions of racism, including white supremacy (e.g., Bonds & Inwood, 2016;Domosh, 2017), ethnic and civic nationalisms (e.g., Antonsich, 2016;Tolia-Kelly, 2011), environmental racism (e.g., Pulido, 2017), racial segregation (e.g., Simpson, 2004), and various other phenomena. These geographies that scholars have investigated since at least the 1980s underpin race and racism's explicit articulation as a core element of far-right ideology.…”
Section: (Anti-)fascism and Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%