Beyond the water cooler: using socialization to understand use and impact of networking services on collaboration in a business incubator

Nijssen, Edwin J.; Borgh, Michel van der

doi:10.1111/radm.12261

Cited by 19 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the one hand, some scholars highlight the BIs' role in developing networks among incubatees (e.g., Bøllingtoft 2012; Nijssen and van der Borgh 2017), with internal networking services that facilitate incubatees' communication and knowledge exchange (Ebbers 2014). These close relationships among incubatees can provide more opportunities for new incubatees to cooperate with business partners, gain momentum, and achieve early growth (Nijssen and van der Borgh 2017). On the other hand, other scholars emphasize the importance of networks, cooperation, and knowledge-sharing with external entities (West and Bogers 2014) and underscore the value of external sources of knowledge and external networks to boost incubatees' innovation and growth (Sungur 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal and external networks, and incubatees’ performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning’s mediating effect

Wang

2020

J Technol Transf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Business incubators (BIs) have gradually evolved to focus increasingly on the development of networks and network functions. However, existing literature indicates that much ambiguity remains regarding the importance and role of cooperation within the incubator networks. In particular, few studies divide incubator networks into internal and external networks to explore how these networks influence the enterprise growth performance (EGP). Based on the social network and organizational learning theories, we analyze the role of entrepreneurial learning (exploratory and exploitative) in the relationship between internal and external networks and EGP in dynamic environments. Through a multiple regression analysis of survey data from 205 incubatees in 14 Chinese business incubators, we find that the BIs' internal and external networks positively impact EGP and exploratory and exploitative learning mediate the relationship between them. Moreover, when incubatees are in a highly dynamic environment, internal networks more positively affect exploitative learning, while external networks inhibit exploratory learning. Finally, we discuss the study's implications.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal and external networks, and incubatees’ performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning’s mediating effect

Wang

2020

J Technol Transf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The relationships embedded in those networks are characterized by trustworthiness and intimacy [37]. Network involvement means entrepreneurs take active part in different kinds of cooperation resulting from distinct services [38,39]. Tenants can occupy a favorable network location by actively taking part in diverse networks [40].…”

Section: Moderating Effects Of Network Involvement On Family Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[6]. On the other hand, incubator management can institutionalize informal networking by means of appropriating layout of incubated firms' physical location [57]; appealing social interaction scenes [38]; and so on.…”

Section: Managerial and Policy Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surviving through Incubation Based on Entrepreneurship-Specific Human Capital Development: The Moderating Role of Tenants’ Network Involvement

Zhang¹,

Gao

Zhou

et al. 2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing upon human capital theory and the co-production view of business support processes, this paper investigates the moderating effects of network involvement on entrepreneurship-specific human capital (ESHC) that determines the tenants’ survival in an incubator. Longitudinal data between 2006 and 2009 of 71 ventures located in an incubator in China have been collected and analyzed. The research confirms that network involvement strengthens the influence of entrepreneurial experience on tenants’ successful graduation, but does not impact the relationship between entrepreneurial family background and tenants’ graduation.

show abstract

“…This blueprint of the HTCE can be summarized in the following five conditions and mechanisms (cf., Cloodt et al, 2016). These conditions and mechanisms also serve to (practically) connect the highly fragmented literature on regional collaboration, innovation hotspots, knowledge sharing, ecosystem development, value chains and related topics (e.g., Boschma, 2005;Chesbrough, 2012;Gilsing, Van Burg, & Romme, 2010;Iansiti & Levien, 2004;Katz & Wagner, 2014;Leten et al, 2013;Nijssen & van der Borgh, 2017;Romme, 1997 …”

Section: Distinctivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward the Blueprint of Campus-Based Ecosystems for Innovation

Romme¹

2017

EMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The "science park" model has long been showing signs of aging, with many science parks now facing budget cuts by local and regional governments. In this study, we dissect the blueprint of a highly successful campus-based ecosystem, the High Tech Campus Eindhoven (HTCE). As an innovation ecosystem, the HTCE provides its residents (a) access to shared resources and facilities, to facilitate research and product development, and (b) an innovation community that enhances knowledge sharing between people at the campus. The success of the HTCE arises from a deep and inclusive understanding of the conditions in which an ecosystem for research and development can thrive, and the commitment to carefully grow and sustain these conditions. These conditions include: low physical distances between the various buildings, offices and shared facilities; a dynamic portfolio of thematic workshops and meetings stimulate knowledge sharing and informal networking; careful management of the diversity and reputation of the campus; attracting and hosting "connectors" that have the capability to initiate and/or manage collaboration across a newly emerging value chain; and a high level of responsiveness to requests and feedback of residents.

show abstract

Beyond the water cooler: using socialization to understand use and impact of networking services on collaboration in a business incubator

Cited by 19 publications

References 42 publications

Internal and external networks, and incubatees’ performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning’s mediating effect

Internal and external networks, and incubatees’ performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning’s mediating effect

Surviving through Incubation Based on Entrepreneurship-Specific Human Capital Development: The Moderating Role of Tenants’ Network Involvement

Toward the Blueprint of Campus-Based Ecosystems for Innovation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About