1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.27.1518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the static limit for quarkonium decays

Abstract: We examine the problems of calculating the leading relativistic corrections to heavyquarkonium decays [relative O(v2)] within the context of QCD. The incorporation of constituent motion in a consistent manner poses nontrivial problems associated with gauge invariance and multiple counting with higher-order contributions in the coupling constant. Although we were unable to resolve these questions in a completely satisfactory manner, we present an improved static limit where the kinematic relativistic correction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 1/m 2 correction in (92) has also been discussed by BBL [5] and by Keung and Muzinich (KM) [18]. It is in fact the only correction that occurs in either approach.…”
Section: Some Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0 1/m 2 correction in (92) has also been discussed by BBL [5] and by Keung and Muzinich (KM) [18]. It is in fact the only correction that occurs in either approach.…”
Section: Some Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(83). Kinematical corrections of type (i) have been discussed by Keung and Muzinich some time ago [18] for S-wave decays and more recently applied also to J/ψ photo- [25] and hadroproduction [7]. The prescription is to evaluate the amplitude A( q 2 , ǫ), (107), at q 2 = mǫ rather than at q 2 = 0.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Approaches and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5). Secondly, the correction calculated in [13], is based on the model proposed in [18], in which the contribution of the momentum q to the energy of the heavy quark is neglected-that is the energy is taken to be M J/ψ /2, in the quarkonium rest frame; it really should be √ m 2 + q 2 . This implies that our result cannot be obtained from that presented in [13] by setting M J/ψ = 2m, and the parameter ǫ proportional to P H/ψ ( 3 S (1) 1 ) .…”
Section: Photoproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, models have been constructed to describe such an order v 2 effect. The one parameter model presented in [18] has been used to examine quarkonia photoproduction by Jung et al [13]; a two parameter model has also been proposed [14]. The O(v 2 ) contribution has not been computed within NRQCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). The order-v 2 and order-v 4 relativistic corrections to the color-singlet contributions were calculated by Keung and Muzinich [6] and by Bodwin and Petrelli [7], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%