Beyond the parish pump: what next for public health?

Abstract

BackgroundPublic health has had a history characterised by uncertainty of purpose, locus of control, and workforce identity. In many health systems, the public health function is fragmented, isolated and under-resourced. We use the most recent major reforms to the English National Health Service and local government, the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA12), as a lens through which to explore the changing nature of public health professionalism.MethodsThis paper is based upon a 3-year longitudinal study into the impacts of the HSCA12 upon the commissioning system in England, in which we conducted 141 interviews with 118 commissioners and senior staff from a variety of health service commissioner and provider organisations, local government, and the third sector. For the present paper, we developed a subset of data relevant to public health, and analysed it using a framework derived from the literature on public health professionalism, exploring themes identified from relevant policy documents and research.ResultsThe move of public health responsibilities into local government introduced an element of politicisation which challenged public health professional autonomy. There were mixed feelings about the status of public health as a specialist profession. The creation of a national public health organisation helped raise the profile of profession, but there were concerns about clarity of responsibilities, accountability, and upholding ‘pure’ public health professional values. There was confusion about the remit of other organisations in relation to public health.ConclusionsWhere public health professionals sit in a health system in absolute terms is less important than their ability to develop relationships, negotiate their roles, and provide expert public health influence across that system. A conflation between ‘population health’ and ‘public health’ fosters unrealistic expectations of the profession. Public health may be best placed to provide leadership for other stakeholders and professional groups working towards improving health outcomes of their defined populations, but there remains a need to clarify the role(s) that public health as a specialist profession has to play in helping to fulfil population health goals.

Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government

“…This suggests that the alcohol licensing function, when conducted regularly and through engagement with other responsible authorities, might be considered a means for a different end, of establishing public health values across multiple different areas of local government work. This perspective echoes the ‘health in all policies’ agenda [27], and the importance of bringing health-related values to the forefront of decision making across multiple areas of policy making that reflect the broadest determinants of health [28].…”

The complexities of integrating evidence-based preventative health into England’s NHS: lessons learnt from the case of PrEP

“…In his interim report evaluating screening programmes following national lapses in breast and cervical cancer screening, Sir Mike Richards [ 41 ] posed the question “who is in charge… [and] The answer is not obvious” (p. 3). The issue of fragmentation is longstanding in England’s health system, and particularly so regarding sexual health [ 42 , 43 ].…”

Systems leadership in practice: thematic insights from three public health case studies

“…Since the 2013 re-organisation of public health in England there have been five major studies of aspects of the UK public health system. One study was a comparison of public health in the four UK nations [11] and four focused on aspects of the public health system in England [12][13][14][15]. None of these focused exclusively on systems leadership in public health, but all referred to it either explicitly, or in some cases implicitly when discussing 'influencing'.…”