2006
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.101.4.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Obvious Limits of Ore Deposits: The Use of Mineralogical, Geochemical, and Biological Features for the Remote Detection of Mineralization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bajc 1998;Cameron et al 2004;Kelley et al 2004Kelley et al , 2006. The results of the AA5 leach suggest that it is effective in showing the anomalies of kimberlite pathfinder elements, including REE, Y, and Ni.…”
Section: Partial Leachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bajc 1998;Cameron et al 2004;Kelley et al 2004Kelley et al , 2006. The results of the AA5 leach suggest that it is effective in showing the anomalies of kimberlite pathfinder elements, including REE, Y, and Ni.…”
Section: Partial Leachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various types of geochemical survey are employed depending on the type of ore deposit target and its geological setting, using the most appropriate media -e.g., drainage (stream sediment), soil or talus, rock, vegetation and ground water -for the environment (see Appendix). Increasingly, geochemical methods are being tested for use in terrain where ore deposits may be covered (Kelley et al, 2006).…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, orebody models are crucial adjuncts to identifying drilling targets, in conjunction with supportive geological and/or geophysical indications. It is expected that in the future very low-level geochemical anomalism that reflects the outermost halo of a deposit may become increasingly useful in providing support for drilling (Kelley et al, 2006).…”
Section: Prospect Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of such geochemical haloes at or near the surface is well established in a variety of environments, although the exact formation mechanisms are still debated and most likely specific to individual conditions (e.g. Cameron, Hamilton, Leybourne, Hall, & McClenaghan, 2004;Kelley, Kelley, Coker, Caughlin, & Doherty, 2006). It is clear that geochemical anomalies can propagate through (even transported) regolith cover via pore water (e.g.…”
Section: Geochemical Footprints Of Mineral Systems In the Regolithmentioning
confidence: 99%