2012
DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2012.708835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Network? Occupy London and the Global Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Pickerill and Chatterton (:736) note about autonomous movements that “squatting a building leads to a greater awareness of national‐global property speculation … a local campaign against school closure can unravel global agreements on privatization and tradable services … [enabling] the building of extra‐local solidarity and resistance”. Halvorson (:431) argues that the Occupy movement “is thus an important reminder that alternative imaginations for other worlds need territories as much as the connections across space”, while Chatterton et al (:614) show how diverse interests converged at the Copenhagen climate talks to “oppose dominant responses to climate change and practice solidaristic alternatives which develop a broader critique of the forces at play shaping localities”. Despite these excellent analyses of solidarity building, scholars have yet to engage directly with more conservative political ideologies as part of the solidarity project.…”
Section: Toward a Situated Solidarity: Perspectives On The Inclusive mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pickerill and Chatterton (:736) note about autonomous movements that “squatting a building leads to a greater awareness of national‐global property speculation … a local campaign against school closure can unravel global agreements on privatization and tradable services … [enabling] the building of extra‐local solidarity and resistance”. Halvorson (:431) argues that the Occupy movement “is thus an important reminder that alternative imaginations for other worlds need territories as much as the connections across space”, while Chatterton et al (:614) show how diverse interests converged at the Copenhagen climate talks to “oppose dominant responses to climate change and practice solidaristic alternatives which develop a broader critique of the forces at play shaping localities”. Despite these excellent analyses of solidarity building, scholars have yet to engage directly with more conservative political ideologies as part of the solidarity project.…”
Section: Toward a Situated Solidarity: Perspectives On The Inclusive mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so would be to disregard the distinctly plural sensibilities that co‐constituted the movement, and to underemphasise the role played by religion in co‐producing the spaces, events and emergent subjectivities of the camps. Yet many existing academic accounts of the Occupy movement downplay the importance of religion even within an emphasis on the spatiality of the occupations (see, for example, Halvorsen ; Pickerill and Krinsky ; Sparke ). We want to argue, however, that the presence of religious spaces, discourses and actors became an active constituent in the emerging discourse, praxis and character of Occupy encampments, albeit in different locally contextualised ways.…”
Section: Religion and The Occupy Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking Occupy as an example, Halvorsen (2012) argues that the movement did not establish global convergence spaces where central nodes for a transnational network emerged, as it was the case for the alter-globalization movement that was largely organized around events such as the world social forum and G8 or G20 meetings. No such attempts have been made within Occupy, except for the alternative day of action on human rights day (10 December 2011).…”
Section: Network Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relational logic establishes consequently a different kind of hierarchy namely between central and peripheral nodes, the ones being visible and the ones being invisible, while downplaying the character and activities constituting a node as such (Halvorsen 2012).…”
Section: Network Societymentioning
confidence: 99%