2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.055025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the MSSM Higgs bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC

Abstract: We study extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) with new degrees of freedom that couple sizably to the MSSM Higgs sector and lie in the TeV range. After integrating out the physics at the TeV scale, the resulting Higgs spectrum can significantly differ from typical supersymmetric scenarios, thereby providing a window beyond the MSSM (BMSSM). Taking into account current LEP and Tevatron constraints, we perform an in-depth analysis of the Higgs collider phenomenology and explore distincti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases ∆ is minimal near M higgs ≈ 115 GeV. For ways to have M higgs ≈ 125 − 130 GeV with smaller fine-tuning ∆ ≈ O(10) in SUSY models see [1,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Jhep07(2012)046mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases ∆ is minimal near M higgs ≈ 115 GeV. For ways to have M higgs ≈ 125 − 130 GeV with smaller fine-tuning ∆ ≈ O(10) in SUSY models see [1,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Jhep07(2012)046mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We let the reader to make his own opinion, based on the above results and figures and also on future LHC data (on gluino, higgs, stop and m susy ) whose updated impact on our ∆ can easily be obtained. Also it should be kept in mind that very simple new physics beyond these SUSY models (like CMSSM with a gauge singlet with a TeV-scale SUSY mass term or a massive U(1) ′ ) can lead to a very acceptable ∆ ≈ O(10) for a higgs mass as large as 130 GeV [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Further, subjective criteria also exist in other approaches that compare the probability of various models, such as those based on the Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Jhep07(2012)046mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this class of models, additional operators are generated when SUSY and the R-symmetry are broken in the hidden sector and the effects are mediated to the observable sector through Planck-suppressed operators. Alternatively, one may generalize the MSSM by introducing effective dimension four and five operators [30][31][32]. These operators can reduce the amount of fine tuning in the scalar sector and be sensitive to new degrees of freedom at the TeV scale.…”
Section: Jhep07(2014)087mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case in mind is the Higgs sector of the BMSSM [20][21][22][23][24][25] which is a general effective Lagrangian approach to the MSSM first introduced to address the naturalness problem [26,27]. Masses up to 250 GeV can be naturally achieved for the lightest Higgs of the model [28][29][30][31][32][33]. Most recent analyses of the model taking into account ATLAS and CMS data now only allow masses below 140 GeV for the lightest Higgs [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%