2016
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1221839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the money shot; or how framing nature matters? LocatingGreenat Wildscreen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst it is well-documented that many cultures do not understand humans and the natural world to be separate entities [e.g. Descola, 1996;Kopenawa and Albert, 2013], it is still widely assumed that for the majority of populations in the Western world, there is a clear distinction between the two that makes conservation action problematic [Büscher and Igoe, 2013;Duffy, 2015;Sullivan, 2016].…”
Section: Beyond Binary Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst it is well-documented that many cultures do not understand humans and the natural world to be separate entities [e.g. Descola, 1996;Kopenawa and Albert, 2013], it is still widely assumed that for the majority of populations in the Western world, there is a clear distinction between the two that makes conservation action problematic [Büscher and Igoe, 2013;Duffy, 2015;Sullivan, 2016].…”
Section: Beyond Binary Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental campaigns have recognized this, and increasingly focus on emotional values to reengage the public (Wu & Lee, 2015). In this context, natural history films have emerged as a platform for reconnecting people to nature, captivating large audiences with entertaining and emotionally charged storylines (Fortner & Lyon, 1985;Sullivan, 2016), but the value of such vicarious connections with nature has been questioned (Ballouard, Brischoux, & Bonnet, 2011; but see Soga, Gaston, Yamaura, Kurisu, & Hanaki, 2016). Moreover, natural history films are often criticized for portraying unrealistic, pristine views of nature (Beck, 2010), despite often featuring endangered species whose survival is time-sensitive (see for example the collapse of Saiga antelope Saiga tatarica populations, witnessed-but not portrayed-by film crews; Kock et al, 2018;Milner-Gulland, Morgan, & Kock, 2016;Nicholls, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ways in which nature–society relations are mediated in movies, on television and through the internet have been shown to mirror common understandings of land/seascapes and non-human beings and to shape how people interact with them (e.g. Barkemeyer et al., 2018; Boykoff, 2011; Büscher, 2013; Collard, 2016; Goodman et al., 2016; Hawkins and Silver, 2017; Silver and Hawkins, 2017; Sullivan, 2016). In this section of our literature review, we take a broad look at nature–society scholarship that theorizes the ways in which nature, nation and gender are mediated, and, often, presented in relation with each other.…”
Section: From Nature–society To Resource Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%