2014
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2014.926762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Dichotomy: Six Religious Views of Homosexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Siendo tres nuestros hallazgos principales: 1) En los varones existe una relación positiva significativa entre la actitud religiosa y actitudes poco tolerantes hacia la homosexualidad. Este resultado es similar a lo reportado en otros estudios realizados en Estados Unidos 8,10,11,13,15 21 , las visiones hacia las conductas homosexuales por parte de la religión son mucho más amplias (Intolerante: "Dios odia a los maricones"; Indiferente: "Nosotros no hablamos de eso"; Tolerante: "Los homosexuales son personas con todos sus derechos"). Los moti vos por los cuales muchas religiones, entre ellas el catolicismo, consideran a la prácti ca homosexual como un pecado son variados, y requieren una aproximación histórica y fi losófi ca que escapa por mucho a este estudio.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Siendo tres nuestros hallazgos principales: 1) En los varones existe una relación positiva significativa entre la actitud religiosa y actitudes poco tolerantes hacia la homosexualidad. Este resultado es similar a lo reportado en otros estudios realizados en Estados Unidos 8,10,11,13,15 21 , las visiones hacia las conductas homosexuales por parte de la religión son mucho más amplias (Intolerante: "Dios odia a los maricones"; Indiferente: "Nosotros no hablamos de eso"; Tolerante: "Los homosexuales son personas con todos sus derechos"). Los moti vos por los cuales muchas religiones, entre ellas el catolicismo, consideran a la prácti ca homosexual como un pecado son variados, y requieren una aproximación histórica y fi losófi ca que escapa por mucho a este estudio.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En una muestra de 400 estudiantes universitarios, se reportó que los 10 reacti vos de esta escala presentaron una alta consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach=0,87) 18 . Moral de la Rubia, estableció los puntos de corte en tres grupos: Tolerante (≤18 puntos), Indiferente (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), e Intolerante u homofóbica (≥28 puntos) 18 .…”
Section: Métodosunclassified
“…Values originating from religious identities and traditions can be especially difficult to reconcile (Barringer, Gay, & Lynxwiler, ; Bidell, ; Whitehead, ; Whitman & Bidell, ) and have been empirically linked to homophobia among samples of counseling professionals (Bowers, Minichiello, & Plummer, ). Popular opinion often suggests a dichotomous relationship between religiosity and acceptance of homosexuality (Moon, ), but such polarization oversimplifies the range of current religious thought. Moon () described religious views along a continuum of homonegative, moderate, and homopositive, and Farmer () found spirituality to be positively correlated with LGB competence among counselors.…”
Section: Counselor Religiosity and Views Of Lgb Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular opinion often suggests a dichotomous relationship between religiosity and acceptance of homosexuality (Moon, ), but such polarization oversimplifies the range of current religious thought. Moon () described religious views along a continuum of homonegative, moderate, and homopositive, and Farmer () found spirituality to be positively correlated with LGB competence among counselors. Therefore, although counselor religiosity alone does not suggest incompetence in working with LGB clients, there is evidence of the tension that can exist between counselor religiosity and client sexual identity.…”
Section: Counselor Religiosity and Views Of Lgb Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumptions of difference in the meanings and meaningfulness of intimacy within same‐sex and heterosexual relationships are widespread within legal, political, and religious discourses (see http://Procon.org, for a compendium). Although variability exists across religion and denomination, sexual acts—behavioral and physical manifestations of intimacy—between to people of the same sex are considered morally wrong and sinful within most popular religious discourses (Clarke, Brown, & Hochstein, ; Kugle, ; Moon, ; Siraj, ). This contention provides the foundation for many conservative religious organizations’ backing for same‐sex marriage bans, including support for DOMA (Camp, ).…”
Section: Meaning‐based Justifications For Exclusionary Marriage Policymentioning
confidence: 99%