DOI: 10.1016/s1047-0042(07)00008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the class act: Gender and race in the ‘creative city’ discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, critical accounts of creative work and creative labour emerging from feminist sociology and cultural economy draw attention to workers themselves, rather than a potentially disembodied 'creative class' that has been the focus of much discussion. Such foregrounding not only of labour market insecurity, low levels of pay, a lack of career progression and pay (Gill 2002(Gill , 2009(Gill , 2010McRobbie 2002McRobbie , 2009Oakley 2004Oakley , 2006Oakley , 2009Ross 2008) but also clear patterns of gendered, racialised and classed inequality (Parker 2008;Negrey and Rausch 2009;Comunian, Faggian, and Li 2010;Leslie and Catungal 2012) stands in sharp contrast to a dominant geographical literature which has conceptually disregarded labour market exclusions. Despite the fact that advertising, design and architecture (for example) remain highly male-dominated sectors, they often continue to be evaluated using theoretical frameworks that rest upon gender-neutral understandings of learning, knowledge creation/exchange and indeed social interaction.…”
Section: Understanding Gender Divisions In Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, critical accounts of creative work and creative labour emerging from feminist sociology and cultural economy draw attention to workers themselves, rather than a potentially disembodied 'creative class' that has been the focus of much discussion. Such foregrounding not only of labour market insecurity, low levels of pay, a lack of career progression and pay (Gill 2002(Gill , 2009(Gill , 2010McRobbie 2002McRobbie , 2009Oakley 2004Oakley , 2006Oakley , 2009Ross 2008) but also clear patterns of gendered, racialised and classed inequality (Parker 2008;Negrey and Rausch 2009;Comunian, Faggian, and Li 2010;Leslie and Catungal 2012) stands in sharp contrast to a dominant geographical literature which has conceptually disregarded labour market exclusions. Despite the fact that advertising, design and architecture (for example) remain highly male-dominated sectors, they often continue to be evaluated using theoretical frameworks that rest upon gender-neutral understandings of learning, knowledge creation/exchange and indeed social interaction.…”
Section: Understanding Gender Divisions In Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical basis of this argument has been strongly critiqued (Scott ) and Florida is rightly seen as a promoter of gentrification (Peck , ), though he has recently moderated his position in light of the rising inequality now seen in “creative” cities (Florida ). Moreover, “creativity” trucks in racialized and gendered assumptions about labor and value (Parker ). Nonetheless, Florida points to a shift in the business culture that characterizes many of the leaders in high‐value industries, away from suburban “nerdistans” and toward dynamic urban milieux: “This urban shift in venture capital and start‐ups is in line with the long held view that dense cities, as opposed to sprawling suburbs, provide the ecology required for breakthrough innovation” (Florida ).…”
Section: Ground Rent and Production In The “Knowledge Economy”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a class of workers who struggle to find stable employment, affordable housing, and social support (Leslie and Rantisi 2012, 466). Further, Parker (2008) argues that there are implicit gendered and racialized assumptions packed into Florida's "progressive" creative class thesis that reproduce socioeconomic inequalities and valorize "hegemonic masculinity" (Parker 2008, 202). Women, minorities, and households are largely obscured in the creative class dialogue as they are not considered the chief "sites of creativity" (Parker 2008, 210).…”
Section: Creativity For Innovation and Economy Or Culture And Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%