2019
DOI: 10.1177/0049124119875960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position: Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography

Abstract: Ethnography is made of relationships. Even when the observations the ethnographer writes of take place between others in the field, it is through the development of relationships that data are generated and through a particular relationship that interpretation is offered. In this introduction to the special issue about relationships and theorizing in ethnography, I outline three relevant dimensions of such relationships that aren't captured by current debates that center on power dynamics in the field: (a) Ali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To what extent are the barriers identified above relevant for other hard-to-reach populations? Historically, social scientists have distinguished hard-to-reach populations by categorizing populations as “studying up” or “studying down.” The “studying up” and “studying down” distinction is not only problematic in implying a value judgment (Tavory 2019), but it is also unhelpful and irrelevant. There are arguably more similarities in gaining access to observations inside a prison and inside a Manhattan hedge fund (Neely 2018) and gaining access to women returning home from prison and unemployed middle-class professionals (Rao 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To what extent are the barriers identified above relevant for other hard-to-reach populations? Historically, social scientists have distinguished hard-to-reach populations by categorizing populations as “studying up” or “studying down.” The “studying up” and “studying down” distinction is not only problematic in implying a value judgment (Tavory 2019), but it is also unhelpful and irrelevant. There are arguably more similarities in gaining access to observations inside a prison and inside a Manhattan hedge fund (Neely 2018) and gaining access to women returning home from prison and unemployed middle-class professionals (Rao 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I acknowledge that lurking exacerbates the risk of power imbalances between myself as the researcher and those being studied, as the researcher is coming from a place of privilege (Tavory, 2019) and ultimately gets to control the narrative in their work. However, if I were to identify myself as a researcher within the 4chan far-right community, I would be exposed to thousands of individuals who have the potential to mobilise and use surveillance and intimidation techniques.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%