Beyond the average effects: The distributional impacts of export promotion programs in developing countries

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. 1 Abstract  Do all exporters benefit the same from export promotion programs? Surprisingly, not matter how obvious this question may a priori be when thinking of the effectiveness of these programs there is virtually no empirical evidence on how they affect export performance in different parts of the distribution of export outcomes. This paper aims at filling this gap in the literature. We assess the distributional impacts of trade promotion activities performing efficient semiparametric quantile treatment effect estimation on assistance, total sales, and highly disaggregated export data for the whole population of Chilean exporters over the period [2002][2003][2004][2005][2006]. We find that these activities have indeed heterogeneous effects over the distribution of export performance, along both the extensive and intensive margins. In particular, smaller firms as measured by their total exports seem to benefit more from export promotion actions. Terms of use: Documents in

Energy efficiency and exporting: Evidence from firm-level data

“…In addition to complementing the existing firm-level research on exporting and environmental performance, our results also support the hypotheses that exporting may encourage innovation and productivity. Although further research is warranted to examine the external validity of our results, the analysis suggests that export-promotion policies in developing countries may have unintended environmental benefits (e.g., Martincus and Carballo, 2010;Martincus et al, 2012).…”

A Multi-perspective Examination of Export Promotion Programs: The Case of PEIEx by APEX-Brasil

“…Similarly, Seringhaus (1984) did not find a relationship between a given program (trade missions) and export intensity or number of orders. Gençtürk and Kotabe (2001) found significant positive results regarding the firm's competitive position, but a nonsignificant result regarding export sales, while Martincus & Carballo (2010) found a positive effect on export sales growth.…”

“…First, engaging firms in sequential and complementary programs tends to improve the results achieved (Martincus & Carballo, 2010). Also, the effectiveness of the program seems to depend on the appropriate employment of support services that should fit the specific export stage of firms (Diamantopoulos et al, 1993;Hultman et al, 2011;Wilkinson & Brouthers, 2000).…”

Estereótipos e Imagem de Produtos do Brasil e da Alemanha a Partir da Percepção de Brasileiros e Alemães

“…Neste contexto, é crescente o número de empresas que vêm buscando desenvolver suas atividades no mercado internacional, uma vez que o processo de internacionalização e a aproximação com os mercados globais são um dos principais focos de atenção para estas organizações (MARTINCUS; CARBALLO, 2010). Esta perspectiva traz a reflexão de que as negociações de caráter internacional sofrem influências de diversos ambientes.…”