2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Supermarkets: Food Outlet Location Selection in Four U.S. Cities Over Time

Abstract: Introduction Understanding what influences where food outlets locate is important for mitigating disparities in access to healthy food outlets. However, few studies have examined how neighborhood characteristics influence the neighborhood food environment over time, and whether these relationships differ by neighborhood-level income. Methods Neighborhood-level data from four U.S. cities (Birmingham, AL; Chicago, IL; Minneapolis, MN; Oakland, CA) from 1986, 1993, 1996, 2001, 2006, and 2011 were used with two-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also indicate that increasing vacancies are associated with increasing food swamps among both low-SES neighborhoods (with African American and non-African American neighborhoods represented) and among African American neighborhoods (in which mainly low-SES neighborhoods were represented; all but one CSA with 93% or more African American residents were also low-SES in this context). These findings build upon and are consistent with prior examinations of food outlets in the U.S. and Canada, reporting that socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods tend to be associated with greater relative access to unhealthier food outlets, such as fast food restaurants or convenience stores, compared to more advantaged neighborhoods [ 51 , 52 ]. Although some recent strategies aiming to increase healthy food availability in impoverished areas have relocated a farmers’ market to the city center, converted a vacant lot to an urban farm, and implemented the acceptance of federal food assistance vouchers for use at farmers’ markets [ 53 , 54 , 55 ], these examples are unique cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results also indicate that increasing vacancies are associated with increasing food swamps among both low-SES neighborhoods (with African American and non-African American neighborhoods represented) and among African American neighborhoods (in which mainly low-SES neighborhoods were represented; all but one CSA with 93% or more African American residents were also low-SES in this context). These findings build upon and are consistent with prior examinations of food outlets in the U.S. and Canada, reporting that socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods tend to be associated with greater relative access to unhealthier food outlets, such as fast food restaurants or convenience stores, compared to more advantaged neighborhoods [ 51 , 52 ]. Although some recent strategies aiming to increase healthy food availability in impoverished areas have relocated a farmers’ market to the city center, converted a vacant lot to an urban farm, and implemented the acceptance of federal food assistance vouchers for use at farmers’ markets [ 53 , 54 , 55 ], these examples are unique cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, while unhealthy food outlets such as fast food restaurants target both African American and White communities, the power of social capital, political influence, and financial resources have been shown to successfully stymie McDonald’s, for example, and its attempt to open in one of New York City’s predominantly White neighborhoods [ 41 ]. This difference in food availability among White neighborhoods was also paralleled in another study, describing that the proportion of a neighborhood’s population that is White was negatively associated with the density of fast food restaurants in low-income neighborhoods over time [ 51 ]. Based on these former findings, another possible explanation for the counterintuitive results in non-African American neighborhoods is that such areas may have additional resources to buffer some negative exposures and perhaps use social capital, community organizing, or advocacy to influence whether certain food outlets move into a neighborhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Analyses of changes to food environments over time have been less common, but a growing body of research using repeat cross-sectional or longitudinal methods has examined temporal trends in the prevalence of "healthy" or "unhealthy" food retailers, and changes in retail distribution by socioeconomic status or race and ethnicity of surrounding communities (Berger et al, 2019;Filomena et al, 2013;James et al, 2017;Kolak et al, 2018;Larsen and Gilliland, 2008;Luan et al, 2015;Maguire et al, 2015;Mundorf et al, 2015;Ohri-Vachaspati et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2014;Rummo et al, 2017) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to measure associations between socioeconomic status and changes to food environments over time have been similarly inconsistent. Several studies have noted increasing numbers of fast food outlets and convenience stores in low-income neighborhoods (Berger et al, 2019;Maguire et al, 2015;Richardson et al, 2014;Rummo et al, 2017). Others have documented the more rapid growth of fast food in wealthier neighborhoods (James et al, 2017) and decreasing numbers of convenience stores in low and medium-income communities (Ohri--Vachaspati et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-income and predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods have fewer supermarkets, and blacks, on average, travel a greater distance to reach their nearest supermarket [9]. Areas with limited food access, often termed “food deserts”, commonly exist in low-income neighborhoods with predominantly black and Hispanic populations [9,12,13,14]. Residents in these underserved neighborhoods may benefit from increased selections of foods in the limited number of small retailers readily accessible to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%