“…It must be noted that, like atmospheres, territories have been conceived as socio-spatial associations that do not include the activities of humans alone, but also that of animals, plants, technologies, objects, and space itself (Brighenti, 2010;Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2018a). Such socio-spatial associations carve out spaces of appropriation that include and exclude other elements and in which certain practices and atmospheres are performed (Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2018b;Kärrholm, 2017). In the case of Lisbon, which we will present in the next sections, this territorial dimension is most evident in the tension between the hegemonic state-led or corporate-led practices of atmospheric production (Adey, 2008(Adey, , 2014Fregonese, 2017;Yu, 2019) and individual everyday practices of atmosphere-making (Bille, 2013(Bille, , 2015Pink and Leder Mackley, 2016), especially in the sense that the construction and designing of atmospheres deterritorialises less obvious or public forms of staging or performing intimate, homely, or private atmospheres.…”