Beyond Remittances: the Redistribution of Cash in Swazi Society

Abstract

There are unwritten rules for the distribution of money in all societies, notably about from and to whom it is appropriate to give and receive money, and when. These rules differ from one society to another, and we err in assuming otherwise. This article examines some reported practices in the redistribution of earnings and other cash in Swaziland. It arises out of a reading of transcriptions of 118 recorded interviews, 49 with wage-earners conducted at their place of work, and 69 with earners or their dependents in the rural areas. These wide-ranging interviews covered many topics besides the giving and receiving of sums of money between kinsmen. From this evidence I attempt to spell out the detailed nature of these rules. To ignore or to be ignorant of their strength and complexity is to fail to recognise a powerful mechanism for redistribution, which goes some way to modify alleged inequalities between town and country, and between one homestead and another within Swaziland. Similar rules probably affect income distribution elsewhere in Africa.

Learning from the South: common challenges and solutions for small‐scale farming

“…Furthermore, risk minimisation, pluriactivity or specialisation and adaptation have historically played a role in small‐scale farmers’ livelihood strategies in the South (e.g. Bryceson 2002; Kurosaki 2003; Ellis 2000; Shackleton and Shackleton 2001; Niehof 2004; Russell 1984). In recent research involving small‐scale farmers in South Africa, changes to farming practices, exploitation of the spatial and temporal diversity of the landscape, and commercialisation of livelihoods through individual and collective action were all found to be direct responses to changing climate parameters (e.g.…”

Understanding Black Households: The Problem

“…These enduring linkages, so hard to pin down , count or quantify, constitute the real domestic structure of peripheral societies. 8 Understanding Black Households outcomes of such surveys which others have conducted (Russell, 1984(Russell, , 1993(Russell, , 1994(Russell, , 1998(Russell, , 2002. The problem revolves around trying to determine the boundaries of a household.…”

“…Some indirect evidence of how rare pooling is amongst black co-residing urban households comes from Skordis and Welch (2002) who , comparing methods of collecting income data, found co-residing coloureds to have more accurate knowledge of one another's income than black people had. An analysis of the way Swazi men in work spent their wages showed a spread of erratic respon sibilities to people in several different households, some ' traditional' -to a wife, a father , a mother, a grandmother -others experienced as immediate personal pressures -to a current girl friend , to a sister needing school fees, to an ex-girl friend with whom he had had a child (Russell, 1984). Wallerstein and Smith 's neat geometry of adjacent life-time pools of shared resources bears little relationship to the untidy, overlapping, inter-locking, ever-changing networks of dependence and responsi bility of contemporary South Africa.…”

Intra‐family Transfers and Income‐pooling

“…But they may also form or be incorporated into different households and develop new commitments that compete with their relationship to kin in areas from which migration occurs. In other words, new circumstances may lead migrants to redefine to whom they are beholden and the extent of their obligation (Russell, 1984). The possibility of migrants developing new ties that erode remittance transfers may be stronger if they intend to settle permanently in places of employment.…”